Moses v. Innoprise Software Inc. et al

Filing 111

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MARK MOSES, Plaintiff, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 No. C -12-05271 EDL ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION v. INNOPRISE SOFTWARE, et al., Defendants. 12 / 13 14 On April 16, 2014, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff’s counsel seeking an extension 15 of time to oppose the Harris Defendants’ motion for summary judgment judgement from April 15, 16 2014, to April 18, 2014. According to Plaintiff’s counsel and the email attached to his letter, the 17 Harris Defendants do not oppose this request. Although Plaintiff’s counsel should have e-filed this 18 request and served it on all parties pursuant to the Federal and Local Rules, the Court grants 19 Plaintiff’s request and orders that Plaintiff’s opposition to the Harris Defendants’ motion for 20 summary judgment is due no later than April 18, 2014.1 The Harward Defendants’ and Harris 21 Defendants’ replies to Plaintiff’s oppositions must be filed consistent with Local Rule 7-3(c). 22 Plaintiff will not be granted any further extension of the briefing deadlines. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 16, 2014 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 1 The Court has directed the Clerk to filed Plaintiff’s letter on the docket.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?