Bohac v. General Mills, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING 21 Second Stipulation re Joint Proposed Briefing Schedule for Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Complaint.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/25/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-05280-JSW Document21-1 Filed01/24/13 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 David T. Biderman, Bar No. 101577 PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: 415.344.7000 Facsimile: 415.344.7050 10 SUSAN FAHRINGER, Bar No.162978 CHARLES C. SIPOS (Pro Hac Vice) BREENA M. ROOS (Pro Hac Vice) PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, 40th Floor Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206-359-8000 Facsimile: 206-359-9000 11 Attorneys for Defendant General Mills, Inc. 6 7 8 9 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 SEAN BOHAC, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MILLS, INC., 20 Case No. C12-05280 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Defendant. 21 [PROPOSED] ORDER 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties dated January 24, 2013, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders as follows: 1. On January 14, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Intervention as Plaintiff (the 26 “Intervention Motion”) in Janney et al. v. General Mills et al., Case No. C12-3919 27 PJH, currently pending in this District. 28 2. If the Intervention Motion is granted, Plaintiff shall dismiss his complaint without 14577-0081/LEGAL25642457.1 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE [C-12-3939 PJH] Case3:12-cv-05280-JSW Document21-1 Filed01/24/13 Page2 of 2 1 2 prejudice within 14 days after the Court grants the Intervention Motion. 3. If the Intervention Motion is denied, the Court sets the following briefing schedule 3 for General Mills to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 4 a. General Mills shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint no 5 later than 14 days after the Court denies the Intervention Motion. 6 b. To the extent that General Mills responds to Plaintiff’s Complaint via motion 7 to dismiss, Plaintiff’s opposition to such motion shall be filed no later than 28 8 days after the motion to dismiss is filed. 9 10 11 12 13 c. Any reply in support of the motion shall be filed by General Mills no later than 14 days after Plaintiff files his opposition. d. The Case Management Conference shall be scheduled after the Court rules on any motion to dismiss filed by General Mills. IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 January 25 DATED: ______________, 2013 Hon. Jeffery S. White United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14577-0081/LEGAL25642457.1 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE [C-12-3939 PJH]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?