Chu et al v. Tribal Technologies, Incorporated et al
Filing
54
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
LI CHING CHU, ROBERT CHING LIANG
HUNG, individually and as successors-ininterest to CINDY K. HUNG (deceased),
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 12-05306 WHA
Plaintiffs,
Related to
v.
No. C 11-04990 WHA
TRIBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED,
TRIBAL BRANDS, INCORPORATED, JEFF
MARTIN, JOE VIERRA, and VICTORIA
DINOVICH
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Defendants.
/
16
17
By order dated January 25, 2013, defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint was
18
granted. The order provided that plaintiffs could seek leave to file an amended complaint by
19
February 15. The order further provided that plaintiffs must file a motion for leave to amend,
20
attaching a proposed amended complaint specifically addressing three matters, including
21
administrative exhaustion under FEHA, applicability of any equitable doctrine excusing failure
22
to exhaust, and specifying what express provisions or implied covenants defendants allegedly
23
breached. The deadline for seeking leave to amend has come and gone, and no motion or
24
proposed amended complaint has been received. Accordingly, the action is hereby DISMISSED
25
26
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.
Judgment will be entered by separate order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: February 22, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?