Symantec Corporation v. Acronis, Inc. et al

Filing 77

ORDER ORDER RE SYMANTEC'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL [DOCKET NO. 58] (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/12/2013)

1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
6

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

FINAL ORDER RE SYMANTEC’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL [DOCKET NO. 58]

Plaintiff,

7
8

No. C 12-05331 SI

SYMANTEC CORP.,

v.
ACRONIS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

/

11
12

Currently before the Court is Symantec’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal [Docket No.

13

58]. On January 31, 2013, the Court ordered Acronis to provide a supplemental declaration establishing

14

good cause for sealing Exhibits 1 and 7, which were submitted with Symantec’s Reply. Docket No. 69.

15

On February 6, 2013, Acronis submitted the supplemental Declaration of Goetz Eaton, explaining that

16

Acronis no longer seeks to file under seal Exhibit 7 and only seeks to file under seal portions of Exhibit

17

1, which is a discovery order issued by Magistrate Judge Corley in Case No. 11-5310 EMC (JSC). Mr.

18

Eaton argues good cause to seal page 4, lines 4-9 and 11-16 and page 6, lines 21-22 of Exhibit 1 exists

19

because Judge Corley filed those portions of her order under seal. Docket No. 74.

20

In light of Judge Corley’s ruling as to her discovery order in Case No. 11-5310, the Court grants

21

Symantec’s administrative motion to file under seal. Within five days of the date of this Order,

22

Symantec shall file e-file in the public docket Exhibit 7 and a revised version of Exhibit 1, redacting

23

page 4, lines 4-9 and 11-16 and page 6, lines 21-22 only. Symantec must also e-file under seal (if it

24

hasn’t already), a full copy of Exhibit 1.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: February 12, 2013
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE