Masson v. Selene Finance, LP et al

Filing 38

Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 32 Motion to Dismiss.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

THERESE C. MASSON,

6

Plaintiff,

7

v.

8
SELENE FINANCE LP, et al.,
9

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

Defendants.
10

) Case No. 12-05335 SC
)
) ORDER DISMISSING CASE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

11
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on March 14, 2013,

12
13

setting a response deadline of April 19, 2013.1

14

Plaintiff did not file an opposition.

15

issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be

16

dismissed.

17

Cause on May 1, 2013, indicating that she intended to file her

18

opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than May 6, 2013.

19

of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has failed to file an

20

opposition.

21

and this case is DISMISSED.

ECF No. 34.

ECF No. 32.

On April 24, 2013, the Court

Plaintiff responded to the Order to Show

As

Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED

22
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

Dated:

26

May 13, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), the response deadline should
have been March 28, 2013.