Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. Blank et al
Filing
13
ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM THE ADR MILTI-OPTION PROGRAM. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 12/10/2012. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
BARBARA J. CHISHOLM (SBN 224656)
RACHEL ZWILLINGER (SBN 268684)
Altshuler Berzon LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: (415) 421-7151
E-mail: bchisholm@altber.com
rzwillinger@altber.com
10
JOEL R. REYNOLDS (SBN 85276)
STEPHEN ZAK SMITH (SBN 228913)
Natural Resources Defense Council
1314 Second Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Telephone: (310) 434-2300
E-mail: jreynolds@nrdc.org
zsmith@nrdc.org
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General
KEVIN W. McARDLE, Trial Attorney
MICHAEL D. THORP, Senior Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Environment and Natural Resources Division
Wildlife & Marine Resources Section
601 D Street, NW, Third Floor
Washington, DC 20004
Tele: (202) 305-0219
E-mail: kevin.mcardle@usdoj.gov
Michael.Thorp@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
23
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE
COUNCIL, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs
24
25
v.
26
STIPULATION REQUESTING
REMOVAL FROM THE ADR MULTIOPTION PROGRAM AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REBECCA BLANK, et al.,
27
Case No. 12-cv-05380-EDL
Defendants.
28
STIPULATION REQUESTING REMOVAL FROM THE ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER, Case No. 12-cv-05380-EDL
1
The undersigned parties appreciate the opportunity to participate in the Court’s ADR multi-
2 option program. The parties, however, agree that the above-captioned administrative review case
3 is not amenable to an intermediate resolution at this time, none of the ADR processes are likely to
4 lead to resolution of the case or deliver benefits sufficient to justify the resources consumed by its
5 use, and the case should continue before the Court. See ADR Local Rule 3-5(e)(3). The parties
6 therefore jointly stipulate and request, pursuant to ADR Local Rule 3-3(c) and Civ. Local Rule 77 12, that the Court remove the above-captioned case from its ADR multi-option program.
8
9 Date: December 10, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
10
11
By: /s/ Barbara J. Chisholm
Barbara J. Chisholm
12
14
BARBARA J. CHISHOLM
RACHEL ZWILLINGER
Altshuler Berzon LLP
15
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
16
17
18
19
20
Dated: December 10, 2012
By: /s/ Kevin W. McArdle, per email authorization
Kevin W. McArdle
KEVIN W. MCARDLE
MICHAEL THORP
U.S. Department of Justice
21
Attorneys for Defendants
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION REQUESTING REMOVAL FROM THE ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER, Case No. 12-cv-05380-EDL
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
December
Dated this ____________ day of _______________________, 2012.
10th
________________________________________
THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION REQUESTING REMOVAL FROM THE ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER, Case No. 12-cv-05380-EDL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?