Lou v. MA Laboratories, Inc et al

Filing 293

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 287 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Janette Wipper (CA Bar # 275264) jwipper@sanfordheisler.com Chaya Mandelbaum (CA Bar # 239084) cmandelbaum@sanfordheisler.com Xinying Valerian (CA Bar # 254890) xvalerian@sanfordheisler.com SANFORD HEISLER, LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 795-2020 Facsimile: (415) 795-2021 Jeremy Heisler (NY Bar # 1653484) jheisler@sanfordheisler.com Andrew Melzer (NY Bar # 4270682) amelzer@sanfordheisler.com SANFORD HEISLER, LLP 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Fl. New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (646) 402-5650 Facsimile: (646) 402-5651 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Thomas Marc Litton (CA Bar # 119985) marc@littonlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS MARC LITTON 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 421-4774 Facsimile: (415) 421-4784 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michelle Lou, et al. and the Plaintiff Classes 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 23 24 MICHELLE LOU, MARSHA BEER, SIMON NIM AND JESUAN RUIZ RODRIGUEZ, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING AND CORRECTIVE NOTICE MA LABORATORIES, INC., ABRAHAM MA, also known as CHIH KENG MA, and CHRISTINE RAO, also known as RUITING C. RAO, and CHRISTY YEE, 27 No. 3:12-cv-05409-WHA (NC) Defendants. 25 28 Case No. 3:12-cv-05409-WHA (NC) (N.D. Cal.) – [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING AND CORRECTIVE NOTICE 1 1 As required by Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), Plaintiffs submit this proposed order for the 2 sealing of Exhibits designated as confidential by Ma Labs. The Exhibits are identified in the 3 concurrently filed Declaration of Xinying Valerian in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative 4 Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits in Support of their Motion for Equitable Tolling and 5 Corrective Notice. All of the Exhibits cited below have been designated confidential in their 6 entirety. 7 RULINGS 8 Document and Description 9 Exhibit 10 to the Valerian Decl. is a true and correct copy of e/pop 10 messages sent from Sales Manager Yuko Arai to members of her sales 11 team dated August 5, 2010 at 2:30 pm and 3:53 pm. This document was 12 produced on a hard drive Bates-Stamped Ma Labs 018862. 13 Ruling on Sealing Grant Exhibit 13 to the Valerian Decl. is a true and correct copy of a sample of Deny 17 Grant Granted in Part: home addresses Deny class members’ Earnings Statements, Bates-stamped Ma Labs 018208, and salaries shall be redacted. 018234, 058673, 056111, 056845, 056312, 063632, 054926. Grant Exhibit 24 to the Valerian Decl. is a true and correct copy of e-mail Deny correspondence between Georgia sales employee Jeremy Ramsell’s then- 18 counsel Amanda Farahany and Mark Musto from May 20 and June 1, 19 2010. This document is Bates-Stamped Ma Labs 065628-065630. 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 Exhibit 25 to the Valerian Decl. is a true and correct copy of e-mail correspondence between Paul Sharman and Mark Musto, dated December Grant Deny 30, 2010, Bates-Stamped Ma Labs 082219-82220. Exhibit 26 to the Valerian Decl.is a true and correct copy of an e-mail from Amanda Farahany to Mark Musto, dated June 17, 2010, Bates- 26 DATE: October 24, 2013. Deny Stamped Ma Labs 065599-065599. IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Grant 28 ___________________________________ William Alsup United States District Judge Case No. 3:12-cv-05409-WHA (NC) (N.D. Cal.) – [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING AND CORRECTIVE NOTICE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?