Lou v. MA Laboratories, Inc et al
Filing
293
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 287 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Janette Wipper (CA Bar # 275264)
jwipper@sanfordheisler.com
Chaya Mandelbaum (CA Bar # 239084)
cmandelbaum@sanfordheisler.com
Xinying Valerian (CA Bar # 254890)
xvalerian@sanfordheisler.com
SANFORD HEISLER, LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 795-2020
Facsimile: (415) 795-2021
Jeremy Heisler (NY Bar # 1653484)
jheisler@sanfordheisler.com
Andrew Melzer (NY Bar # 4270682)
amelzer@sanfordheisler.com
SANFORD HEISLER, LLP
1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Fl.
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: (646) 402-5650
Facsimile: (646) 402-5651
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Thomas Marc Litton (CA Bar # 119985)
marc@littonlaw.com
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS MARC LITTON
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 421-4774
Facsimile: (415) 421-4784
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michelle Lou, et al.
and the Plaintiff Classes
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
23
24
MICHELLE LOU, MARSHA BEER, SIMON
NIM AND JESUAN RUIZ RODRIGUEZ,
Individually and On Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
MOTION FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING
AND CORRECTIVE NOTICE
MA LABORATORIES, INC., ABRAHAM
MA, also known as CHIH KENG MA, and
CHRISTINE RAO, also known as RUITING
C. RAO, and CHRISTY YEE,
27
No. 3:12-cv-05409-WHA (NC)
Defendants.
25
28
Case No. 3:12-cv-05409-WHA (NC) (N.D. Cal.) – [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION
FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING AND CORRECTIVE NOTICE
1
1
As required by Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), Plaintiffs submit this proposed order for the
2
sealing of Exhibits designated as confidential by Ma Labs. The Exhibits are identified in the
3
concurrently filed Declaration of Xinying Valerian in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative
4
Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits in Support of their Motion for Equitable Tolling and
5
Corrective Notice. All of the Exhibits cited below have been designated confidential in their
6
entirety.
7
RULINGS
8
Document and Description
9
Exhibit 10 to the Valerian Decl. is a true and correct copy of e/pop
10
messages sent from Sales Manager Yuko Arai to members of her sales
11
team dated August 5, 2010 at 2:30 pm and 3:53 pm. This document was
12
produced on a hard drive Bates-Stamped Ma Labs 018862.
13
Ruling on
Sealing
Grant
Exhibit 13 to the Valerian Decl. is a true and correct copy of a sample of
Deny
17
Grant
Granted in Part:
home addresses
Deny
class members’ Earnings Statements, Bates-stamped Ma Labs 018208, and salaries shall
be redacted.
018234, 058673, 056111, 056845, 056312, 063632, 054926.
Grant
Exhibit 24 to the Valerian Decl. is a true and correct copy of e-mail
Deny
correspondence between Georgia sales employee Jeremy Ramsell’s then-
18
counsel Amanda Farahany and Mark Musto from May 20 and June 1,
19
2010. This document is Bates-Stamped Ma Labs 065628-065630.
14
15
16
20
21
22
23
24
25
Exhibit 25 to the Valerian Decl. is a true and correct copy of e-mail
correspondence between Paul Sharman and Mark Musto, dated December
Grant
Deny
30, 2010, Bates-Stamped Ma Labs 082219-82220.
Exhibit 26 to the Valerian Decl.is a true and correct copy of an e-mail
from Amanda Farahany to Mark Musto, dated June 17, 2010, Bates-
26
DATE: October 24, 2013.
Deny
Stamped Ma Labs 065599-065599.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Grant
28
___________________________________
William Alsup
United States District Judge
Case No. 3:12-cv-05409-WHA (NC) (N.D. Cal.) – [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION
FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING AND CORRECTIVE NOTICE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?