Lou v. MA Laboratories, Inc et al

Filing 436

ORDER REGARDING FEBRUARY 27 HEARING re 435 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 426 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication filed by MA Laboratories, Inc, Christy Yee, Christine Rao, Abr aham Ma, 434 Order, 426 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication filed by Christy Yee, 432 Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 24, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2014)

1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
9

MICHELLE LOU, MARSHA BEER,
SIMON NIM, and JESUAN RUIZ
RODRIGUEZ, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13

No. C 12-05409 WHA

v.
MA LABORATORIES, INC., ABRAHAM
MA, CHRISTINE RAO, and CHRISTY
YEE,

ORDER REGARDING
FEBRUARY 27 HEARING

Defendants.

14

/

15
On February 4, the parties appeared before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley for a

16
17

settlement conference. The case settled and the terms of the settlement were placed on the

18

record (Dkt. No. 432). The parties were informed that all deadlines remained in place until the

19

case was dismissed. A February 19 order reminded the parties that they should file a notice of

20

voluntary dismissal in light of their alleged settlement, otherwise they were ordered to appear on

21

February 27, the date noticed for defendant Christy Yee’s motion for summary judgment. This

22

order notes that the parties never filed an opposition or reply to Ms. Yee’s motion.
Since the parties have failed to follow-up with a notice of voluntary dismissal, the parties

23
24

are ordered to appear on FEBRUARY 27 AT 8:00 A.M. The parties should be prepared to explain

25

why this action should not be dismissed in light of the parties’ alleged settlement entered on the

26

record.

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 24, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE