Lou v. MA Laboratories, Inc et al

Filing 441

ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE by Hon. William Alsup finding as moot 426 Motion for Summary Judgment.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2014)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9

Plaintiffs,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

v.
MA LABORATORIES, INC., ABRAHAM
MA, and CHRISTINE RAO,

ORDER REGARDING
CASE SCHEDULE

Defendants.
/

15
16

No. C 12-05409 WHA

MICHELLE LOU, MARSHA BEER,
SIMON NIM, and JESUAN RUIZ
RODRIGUEZ, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,

Contrary to the parties’ representations, the parties have not reached a complete

17

settlement. In light of the unreasonable position defendants have taken regarding the FLSA opt-

18

in plaintiffs, the Court will entertain additional briefing regarding whether a motion for

19

reconsideration of the January 8 omnibus order regarding certification is appropriate (Dkt.

20

No. 420). Plaintiff’s submission is due by NOON ON MARCH 14 and the response is due by

21

NOON ON MARCH 21. Since the parties have not settled the case, the parties are once again

22

reminded that all deadlines remain in place. The case will proceed to trial on APRIL 21, unless a

23

notice of voluntary dismissal is timely filed pursuant to FRCP 41(a). If the parties fail to timely

24

file their pre-trial papers, this action will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This order notes

25

that the parties filed a stipulation dismissing defendant Christy Yee pursuant to FRCP 41(a) on

26

February 26. Ms. Yee’s motion for summary judgment is thus DENIED AS MOOT.

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 27, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE