Lou v. MA Laboratories, Inc et al
Filing
65
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES ON PENDING ARBITRATION MOTION AND FOR ORDER COMBINING BRIEFING ON ARBITRATION MOTIONS AND EXTENDING RELATED DEADLINES filed by Michelle Lou, Motions terminated: 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES ON PENDING ARBITRATION MOTION AND FOR ORDER COMBINING BRIEFING ON ARBITRATION MOTIONS AND EXTENDING RELATED DEADLINES filed by M ichelle Lou., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES ON PENDING ARBITRATION MOTION AND FOR ORDER COMBINING BRIEFING ON ARBITRATION MOTIONS AND EXTENDING RELATED DEADLINES, 31 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Compel Arbitration and Stay the Action Pending Arbitration; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Responses due by 4/11/2013. Replies due by 4/29/2013. Motion Hearing set for 5/9/2013 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 26, 2013.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Janette Wipper (CA Bar # 275264)
jwipper@sanfordheisler.com
Xinying Valerian (CA Bar # 254890)
xvalerian@sanfordheisler.com
Chaya Mandelbaum (CA Bar # 239084)
cmandelbaum@sanfordheisler.com
SANFORD HEISLER, LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 795-2020
Facsimile: (415) 795-2021
Jeremy Heisler (NY Bar # 1653484)
jheisler@sanfordheisler.com
Andrew Melzer (NY Bar # 4270682)
amelzer@sanfordheisler.com
SANFORD HEISLER, LLP
1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Fl.
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: (646) 402-5650
Facsimile: (646) 402-5651
(Admitted pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Plaintiff Michelle Lou
and the Plaintiff Class
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
MICHELLE LOU, Individually and On
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
v.
MA LABORATORIES, INC., et al.,
No. 3:12-cv-05409-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION
OF DEADLINES ON PENDING
ARBITRATION MOTION AND FOR
ORDER COMBINING BRIEFING ON
ARBITRATION MOTIONS AND
EXTENDING RELATED DEADLINES
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff and Defendants regarding the extension of
26
deadlines on pending arbitration motion and for order combining briefing on arbitration motions
27
and extending related deadlines, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered as
28
follows:
Case No. 3:12-cv-05409 WHA (N.D. Cal.) – [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES ON
PENDING ARBITRATION MOTION AND FOR ORDER COMBINING BRIEFING ON ARBITRATION
MOTIONS AND EXTENDING RELATED DEADLINES
1
1
2
1.
The current deadlines set forth in the Court's February 11, 2013 order concerning
arbitration briefing are modified to account for Defendants' second arbitration motion, as follows:
3
a.
Defendants shall file their motion to compel individual arbitration against
Xueou Feng by April 1, 2013; March 28;
4
5
b.
6
Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the pending arbitration motion
against Plaintiff Lou, and the upcoming motion against Xueou Feng, by
April 11,
30
April 15, 2013, in a combined brief not to exceed 45 pages; and
7
8
c.
9
Defendants shall file their combined reply brief in support of both
11
2.
arbitration motions by April 29, 2013, in a combined brief not to exceed 45
15 pages.
pages.
May 9.
A hearing on both arbitration motions shall be held on
.
12
3.
Plaintiff's deadline to seek leave to add any new parties or pleading amendments
10
13
shall be
May 13.
.
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
DATED:
March 26, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:12-cv-05409 WHA (N.D. Cal.) – [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES ON
PENDING ARBITRATION MOTION AND FOR ORDER COMBINING BRIEFING ON ARBITRATION
MOTIONS AND EXTENDING RELATED DEADLINES
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?