Lou v. MA Laboratories, Inc et al

Filing 66

AMENDED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 40 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Order on Discovery Letter Brief, Order on Motion for Leave to File,,,,,, 31 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants& #039; Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Compel Arbitration and Stay the Action Pending Arbitration; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by MA Laboratories, Inc, Christy Yee, Christine Rao , Abraham Ma, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 40 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Order on Discovery Letter Brief, Order on Motion for Leave to File,,,,,, 31 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Compel Arbitration and Stay the Action Pending Arbitration; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Replies due by 4/19/2013.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 26, 2013.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Janette Wipper (CA Bar # 275264) jwipper@sanfordheisler.com Xinying Valerian (CA Bar # 254890) xvalerian@sanfordheisler.com Chaya Mandelbaum (CA Bar # 239084) cmandelbaum@sanfordheisler.com SANFORD HEISLER, LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 795-2020 Facsimile: (415) 795-2021 Jeremy Heisler (NY Bar # 1653484) jheisler@sanfordheisler.com Andrew Melzer (NY Bar # 4270682) amelzer@sanfordheisler.com SANFORD HEISLER, LLP 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Fl. New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (646) 402-5650 Facsimile: (646) 402-5651 (Admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff Michelle Lou and the Plaintiff Class 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 MICHELLE LOU, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, 18 19 20 v. MA LABORATORIES, INC., et al., No. 3:12-cv-05409-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES ON PENDING ARBITRATION MOTION AND FOR ORDER COMBINING BRIEFING ON ARBITRATION MOTIONS AND EXTENDING RELATED DEADLINES Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff and Defendants regarding the extension of 26 deadlines on pending arbitration motion and for order combining briefing on arbitration motions 27 and extending related deadlines, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered as 28 follows: Case No. 3:12-cv-05409 WHA (N.D. Cal.) – [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES ON PENDING ARBITRATION MOTION AND FOR ORDER COMBINING BRIEFING ON ARBITRATION MOTIONS AND EXTENDING RELATED DEADLINES 1 1 2 1. The current deadlines set forth in the Court's February 11, 2013 order concerning arbitration briefing are modified to account for Defendants' second arbitration motion, as follows: 3 a. Defendants shall file their motion to compel individual arbitration against Xueou Feng by April 1, 2013; March 28; 4 5 b. 6 Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the pending arbitration motion against Plaintiff Lou, and the upcoming motion against Xueou Feng, by April 11, 30 April 15, 2013, in a combined brief not to exceed 45 pages; and 7 8 c. 11 2. Defendants shall file their combined reply brief in support of both 19 arbitration motions by April 29, 2013, in a combined brief not to exceed 45 15 pages. pages. May 9. A hearing on both arbitration motions shall be held on . 12 3. Plaintiff's deadline to seek leave to add any new parties or pleading amendments 9 10 13 shall be May 13. . 14 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 DATED: March 26, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:12-cv-05409 WHA (N.D. Cal.) – [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES ON PENDING ARBITRATION MOTION AND FOR ORDER COMBINING BRIEFING ON ARBITRATION MOTIONS AND EXTENDING RELATED DEADLINES 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?