Emblaze Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 32

MINUTE ORDER IN RESPONSE TO STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 27 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Emblaze Ltd. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 25, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

EMBLAZE LTD.,

Case No. 12-cv-05422-JST

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER IN RESPONSE TO
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Re: Dkt. No. 27.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting ADR Process,
which was filed on January 24, 2013, before this case was reassigned. Dkt. No. 27. In it, the

15
parties agree to participate in mediation and agree to hold the mediation session by 60 days after
16
17

issuance of a claim construction order.

18

The Reassignment Order requires the parties to familiarize themselves with the Court's

19

standing orders and to file case management statements, either jointly or separately, within 15

20

days of the Reassignment Order. Dkt. No. 30. In their statement or statements, the parties are

21

ordered to address any deadlines in place before reassignment, and describe any requested

22

modifications of those dates. The parties are also directed to address the status of their negotiations

23
24

and discovery processes.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1
2
3
4

The Court will be in a better position to evaluate the proper deadline for mediation after the
receipt of this information.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 25, 2013

5
6

________________________
Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2