Emblaze Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 47

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER REGARDING COORDINATION OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NONINFRINGEMENT. Statement due by 8/27/2013. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 21, 2013. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2013)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 From: To: Cc: "Halpern, Kenneth (Perkins Coie)" <KHalpern@perkinscoie.com> "jstcrd@cand.uscourts.gov" <jstcrd@cand.uscourts.gov> "Kelley, Christopher L. (Perkins Coie)" <CKelley@perkinscoie.com>, "McNamara, Antoine (Perkins Coie)" <AMcNamara@perkinscoie.com>, "Wesenberg, Eric (Perkins Coie)" <EWesenberg@perkinscoie.com> Date: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:41AM Subject: Emblaze v. Microsoft (Case No. 12-cv-5422) -- Question regarding scheduling of summary judgment in relation to claim construction Dear Mr. Noble: As you suggested when we spoke yesterday, I am emailing you with the following question regarding scheduling in the Emblaze/Microsoft matter. The technology tutorial is presently scheduled for Tuesday, October 29, 2013 at 2 pm, and the claim construction hearing for Tuesday, November 12, 2013, also at 2 pm. If Microsoft wanted to file a summary judgment motion on noninfringement to be heard, or at least considered, concurrently with claim construction, what schedule would the Court prefer? Should the noninfringement motion be heard as part of or immediately following the claim construction hearing, or sometime thereafter, and if so, how long thereafter would the Court consider to be optimal? Many thanks, Ken Halpern Kenneth J. Halpern | Perkins Coie LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, California 94304-1212 PHONE: 650.838.4308 (O) • 650.815.8889 (M) IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with Treasury Department and IRS regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly indicated otherwise, any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written by Perkins Coie LLP to be used, and cannot be used by the taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein (or any attachments). ********** NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. http://09canmail01w.uscmail.dcn/mail/cand/jstcrd.nsf/(%24Inbox)/8CC0EDE630DBFEA0... 8/22/2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?