Emblaze Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation
Filing
69
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 68 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 66 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Cohen & Gresser LLP Stipulated Request for Order Enlarging Time In Connection With Microsoft's Motion to Disqualify Cohen & Gresser LLP As Counsel For Emblaze Ltd. filed by Emblaze Ltd. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 10, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Scott R. Raber (SBN 194924)
scott.raber@rimonlaw.com
RIMON P.C.
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415.683.5472
Facsimile: 800.930.7271
Alexandra Wald (admitted pro hac vice)
awald@cohengresser.com
Francisco A. Villegas (SBN 206997)
fvillegas@cohengresser.com
Damir Cefo (admitted pro hac vice)
dcefo@cohengresser.com
Erik Hanson (admitted pro hac vice)
ehanson@cohengresser.com
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10022
Phone: 212.957.7600
Facsimile: 212.957.4514
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Emblaze Ltd.
Eric L. Wesenberg (SBN 139696)
EWesenberg@perkinscoie.com
Christopher L. Kelley (SBN 166608)
CKelley@perkinscoie.com
Kenneth J. Halpern (SBN 187663)
KHalpern@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: 650.838.4300
Facsimile: 650.838.4350
Antoine M. McNamara (SBN 261980)
AMcNamara@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: 206.359.8000
Facsimile: 206.359.9000
Isabella E. Fu (SBN 154677)
Associate General Counsel
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
Telephone: 425.882.8080
Facsimile: 425.936.7329
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
Microsoft Corporation
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
21
EMBLAZE LTD.,
22
23
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:12-cv-05422-JST
v.
24
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
25
Defendant.
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME IN CONNECTION WITH
MICROSOFT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COHEN & GRESSER LLP AS COUNSEL
FOR EMBLAZE LTD.
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING
EXTENSION
CASE NO. 4:12-cv-5422 JST
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
This stipulation is made between Plaintiff Emblaze Ltd. (“Emblaze”) and Defendant
Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), by and through their respective counsel. The parties herein
agree and stipulate as follows:
1.
Emblaze’s time to file a Response to Microsoft’s Motion to Disqualify Cohen &
Gresser LLP as Counsel for Emblaze Ltd. (D.E. #66), which is currently scheduled for April 18,
2014, shall be extended to May 1, 2014.
2.
Microsoft’s time to file a Reply in support of its Motion to Disqualify, which is
currently due April 25, 2014, shall be extended to May 14, 2014.
3.
The parties do not anticipate that the requested extension will have an effect on the
schedule in this case, or on the hearing date of May 29, 2014 requested by Microsoft.
4.
The previous time modifications in this case are as follows: A Case Management
Conference had originally been scheduled for February 11, 2013 (D.E. #21), before being vacated
and reset to February 25, 2013, and subsequently being vacated pursuant to a Reassignment Order
(D.E. #30). Subsequent to the Clerk’s Notice Setting Case Management Conference (D.E. #37),
the parties filed a Joint Stipulation Requesting an Extension for the Case Management
Conference (D.E. #38), and an extension of 14 days was granted (D.E. #39). A Joint Statement
Proposing Schedules for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction Briefing had originally
been scheduled for August 27, 2013. (D.E. #47). The parties filed a Joint Stipulation Requesting
an Extension for Filing Statement Proposing Schedules for Summary Judgment and Claim
Construction Briefing (D.E. #48), and an extension of 2 days was granted (D.E. #49). A
technology tutorial had originally been scheduled for October 29, 2013 and a claims construction
hearing had originally been scheduled for November 12, 2013. (D.E. #42). Pursuant to Court
Order (D.E. #57), the tutorial was continued to December 16, 2013 and the claims construction
hearing was continued to December 18, 2013. Pursuant to Court Order (D.E. #60), the tutorial
was subsequently continued to February 4, 2014 and the claims construction hearing was
continued to February 6, 2014. Pursuant to Clerk’s Notice (D.E. #61), the tutorial was continued
to March 3, 2014 and the claims construction hearing continued to March 5, 2014. Pursuant to
28
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING
EXTENSION
-2-
CASE NO. 4:12 cv 5422 JST
1
2
Clerk’s Notice (D.E. #62), the tutorial was continued to June 9, 2014 and the claims construction
hearing was continued to June 11, 2014.
3
4
5
DATED: April 9, 2014
RIMON P.C.
By:
6
/s/ Scott R. Raber
Scott R. Raber
Attorneys for Plaintiff Emblaze Ltd.
7
PERKINS COIE LLP
8
DATED: April 9, 2014
By:
9
10
/s/ Eric L. Wesenberg
Eric L. Wesenberg
Attorneys for Defendant Microsoft Corporation
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
DATED: April 10, 2014
By:
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING
EXTENSION
-3-
CASE NO. 4:12 cv 5422 JST
1
2
3
4
5
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the
laws of the United States of America that concurrence in this filing has been obtained from
signatory Eric L. Wesenberg.
Executed this 9th day of April, 2014 at San Francisco, California.
6
7
/s/ Scott R. Raber
Scott R. Raber
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING
EXTENSION
-4-
CASE NO. 4:12 cv 5422 JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?