Emblaze Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 69

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 68 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 66 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Cohen & Gresser LLP Stipulated Request for Order Enlarging Time In Connection With Microsoft's Motion to Disqualify Cohen & Gresser LLP As Counsel For Emblaze Ltd. filed by Emblaze Ltd. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 10, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Scott R. Raber (SBN 194924) scott.raber@rimonlaw.com RIMON P.C. One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: 415.683.5472 Facsimile: 800.930.7271 Alexandra Wald (admitted pro hac vice) awald@cohengresser.com Francisco A. Villegas (SBN 206997) fvillegas@cohengresser.com Damir Cefo (admitted pro hac vice) dcefo@cohengresser.com Erik Hanson (admitted pro hac vice) ehanson@cohengresser.com COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212.957.7600 Facsimile: 212.957.4514 Attorneys for Plaintiff Emblaze Ltd. Eric L. Wesenberg (SBN 139696) EWesenberg@perkinscoie.com Christopher L. Kelley (SBN 166608) CKelley@perkinscoie.com Kenneth J. Halpern (SBN 187663) KHalpern@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 Telephone: 650.838.4300 Facsimile: 650.838.4350 Antoine M. McNamara (SBN 261980) AMcNamara@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Isabella E. Fu (SBN 154677) Associate General Counsel Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone: 425.882.8080 Facsimile: 425.936.7329 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant Microsoft Corporation 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 EMBLAZE LTD., 22 23 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:12-cv-05422-JST v. 24 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME IN CONNECTION WITH MICROSOFT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COHEN & GRESSER LLP AS COUNSEL FOR EMBLAZE LTD. JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION CASE NO. 4:12-cv-5422 JST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 This stipulation is made between Plaintiff Emblaze Ltd. (“Emblaze”) and Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), by and through their respective counsel. The parties herein agree and stipulate as follows: 1. Emblaze’s time to file a Response to Microsoft’s Motion to Disqualify Cohen & Gresser LLP as Counsel for Emblaze Ltd. (D.E. #66), which is currently scheduled for April 18, 2014, shall be extended to May 1, 2014. 2. Microsoft’s time to file a Reply in support of its Motion to Disqualify, which is currently due April 25, 2014, shall be extended to May 14, 2014. 3. The parties do not anticipate that the requested extension will have an effect on the schedule in this case, or on the hearing date of May 29, 2014 requested by Microsoft. 4. The previous time modifications in this case are as follows: A Case Management Conference had originally been scheduled for February 11, 2013 (D.E. #21), before being vacated and reset to February 25, 2013, and subsequently being vacated pursuant to a Reassignment Order (D.E. #30). Subsequent to the Clerk’s Notice Setting Case Management Conference (D.E. #37), the parties filed a Joint Stipulation Requesting an Extension for the Case Management Conference (D.E. #38), and an extension of 14 days was granted (D.E. #39). A Joint Statement Proposing Schedules for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction Briefing had originally been scheduled for August 27, 2013. (D.E. #47). The parties filed a Joint Stipulation Requesting an Extension for Filing Statement Proposing Schedules for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction Briefing (D.E. #48), and an extension of 2 days was granted (D.E. #49). A technology tutorial had originally been scheduled for October 29, 2013 and a claims construction hearing had originally been scheduled for November 12, 2013. (D.E. #42). Pursuant to Court Order (D.E. #57), the tutorial was continued to December 16, 2013 and the claims construction hearing was continued to December 18, 2013. Pursuant to Court Order (D.E. #60), the tutorial was subsequently continued to February 4, 2014 and the claims construction hearing was continued to February 6, 2014. Pursuant to Clerk’s Notice (D.E. #61), the tutorial was continued to March 3, 2014 and the claims construction hearing continued to March 5, 2014. Pursuant to 28 JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION -2- CASE NO. 4:12 cv 5422 JST 1 2 Clerk’s Notice (D.E. #62), the tutorial was continued to June 9, 2014 and the claims construction hearing was continued to June 11, 2014. 3 4 5 DATED: April 9, 2014 RIMON P.C. By: 6 /s/ Scott R. Raber Scott R. Raber Attorneys for Plaintiff Emblaze Ltd. 7 PERKINS COIE LLP 8 DATED: April 9, 2014 By: 9 10 /s/ Eric L. Wesenberg Eric L. Wesenberg Attorneys for Defendant Microsoft Corporation 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 DATED: April 10, 2014 By: The Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION -3- CASE NO. 4:12 cv 5422 JST 1 2 3 4 5 ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that concurrence in this filing has been obtained from signatory Eric L. Wesenberg. Executed this 9th day of April, 2014 at San Francisco, California. 6 7 /s/ Scott R. Raber Scott R. Raber 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION -4- CASE NO. 4:12 cv 5422 JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?