Wiggins v. Housley et al

Filing 10

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE re 8 Response ( Non Motion ) filed by Zephyr Real Estate, 9 Declaration in Support, filed by Zephyr Real Estate, 5 Order Reopening Case (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DAWN WIGGINS,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE

BARBARA HOUSELY, et al.,
Defendants.
/

15
16

No. C 12-05430 WHA

Due to factors outside the parties’ control, the previously-set briefing schedule was not

17

observed. Defendant Zephyr has now filed its objections (Dkt. Nos. 8–9). Plaintiff will be

18

permitted an opportunity to respond in a brief not to exceed 10 pages by FEBRUARY 14 AT

19

NOON. No replies, please.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 31, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE