Wiggins v. Housley et al
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE re 8 Response ( Non Motion ) filed by Zephyr Real Estate, 9 Declaration in Support, filed by Zephyr Real Estate, 5 Order Reopening Case (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE
BARBARA HOUSELY, et al.,
No. C 12-05430 WHA
Due to factors outside the parties’ control, the previously-set briefing schedule was not
observed. Defendant Zephyr has now filed its objections (Dkt. Nos. 8–9). Plaintiff will be
permitted an opportunity to respond in a brief not to exceed 10 pages by FEBRUARY 14 AT
NOON. No replies, please.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 31, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?