Kane et al v. Delong et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) filed by Daniel J. Kane, Mesa Photonics, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/6/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

WILLIAM H. WRIGHT (SB 161580)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL D. OWENS (SB 266191)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
777 South Figueroa Street
Suite 3200
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

SEDGWICK LLP
ROBERT HARKINS (State Bar No. 179525)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER MING (State Bar No. 260367)
[e-mail]
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104-2834
Telephone:
415.781.7900
Facsimile:
415.781.2635

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Daniel J. Kane and Mesa Photonics, LLC

Attorneys for Defendants
Kenneth W. DeLong,
Femtosoft Technologies and Femtosoft
Technologies, LLC

6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13

Daniel J. Kane and Mesa Photonics, LLC,
Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17

v.
Kenneth W. DeLong, Femtosoft Technologies,
Femtosoft Technologies, LLC and DOES 1-10,

Case No. 3:12-cv-05437-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)
Judge:

Edward M. Chen

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF ACTION
3:12-CV-05437-EMC

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Daniel J. Kane and Mesa Photonics, LLC and Defendants Kenneth W.

2

DeLong, Femtosoft Technologies and Femtosoft Technologies, LLC have settled this matter on

3

mutually-agreeable terms.

4

NOW, THEREFORE, on the basis of the settlement reached, pursuant to Federal Rule of

5

Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between

6

the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, that:

7

1.

The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

8

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

9

3.

The Clerk shall close this file.

10
11

Dated: August 6, 2013

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
By:

12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
Daniel J. Kane and Mesa Photonics, LLC

14
15

/s/ William H. Wright
WILLIAM H. WRIGHT
MICHAEL D. OWENS

Dated: August 6, 2013

SEDGWICK LLP

16

By:

17
18

/s/ Robert Harkins
ROBERT HARKINS
JENNIFER MING
Attorneys for Defendants,
Kenneth W. DeLong, Femtosoft Technologies,
Femtosoft Technologies, LLC

19
20

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

21
22

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1 and General Order No. 45, I attest under penalty of perjury that

23

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Robert Harkins.

24

Dated: August 6, 2013

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
By:

25
ISTR
IT IS SO ORDERED: ICT
ES D

27

_________________ RED
RDE
Edward M. IChen O
T IS SO
U.S. District Judge

C

. Chen

A

H

LI

RT

ER

FO

NO

dward M

Judge E

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
Daniel J. Kane and Mesa Photonics, LLC

R NIA

UNIT
ED

28

T
TA

RT
U
O

S

26

/s/ William H. Wright
WILLIAM H. WRIGHT
MICHAEL D. OWENS

C

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF ACTION
3:12-CV-05437-EMC