Hammack v. Continental Casualty Company

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 26 Stipulation filed by Loretta Hammack. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/26/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2013)

1
2
3
4

Rebecca Grey (State Bar No. 194940)
THE GREY LAW FIRM, P.C.
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1101
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

5
6

Attorney for Plaintiff
William Hammack

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

LORETTA HAMMACK, as Guardian ad Litem on
Behalf of WILLIAM HAMMACK,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

vs.
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

17

) Case No. 3:12-cv-05464-EMC
)
) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
) PREJUDICE ; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18
19
20
21
22

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice is
entered into by and between Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Loretta Hammack, as guardian ad litem on behalf
of William Hammack, and defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Continental Casualty Company.
WHEREAS, on October 23, 2012 Plaintiff Loretta Hammack, as guardian ad litem on behalf of William

23

Hammack, filed the Complaint initiating this action and asserting various claims against Defendant Continental

24

Casualty Company, including: 1) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and 2) breach of contract.

25

WHEREAS, on November 26, 2012 Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Continental Casualty

26

Company filed an Answer and Counterclaim asserting a claim for declaratory judgment against Counterclaim

27

Defendant Loretta Hammack, as guardian ad litem on behalf of William Hammack.

28
-1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case No. 3:12-cv-05464EMC

1

NOW THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that all claims in the Complaint and Answer With

2

Counterclaim for Declaratory Judgment between Loretta Hammack, as guardian ad litem on behalf of William

3

Hammack, and Continental Casualty Company be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party to bear its own

4

costs and attorneys’ fees.

5

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

6
7
8
9

Dated: June 21, 2013

THE GREY LAW FIRM PC

10
By: /s/ Rebecca Grey
Rebecca Grey
Attorney for Plaintiff
LORETTA HAMMACK, as Guardian ad litem on behalf
of William Hammack

11
12
13
14

Dated: June 21, 2013

EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP

15
16

By: /s/ Brent R. Austin
Brent R. Austin
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY

17
18
19

27

R NIA
FO

LI

ER

en

d M. Ch

dwar
Judge E

H

26

RT

25

___________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

NO

24

TED
GRAN

A

23

UNIT
ED

22

IT IS SO

RT
U
O

21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
A
ORDERED: T

S

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28
-2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case No. 3:12-cv-05464EMC