Lahiji v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al

Filing 15

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by NOON ON 1/14/2013.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/10/13. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/10/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7

AMIR LAHIJI,

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 12-05473 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA;
CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY;
FIDELITY CAPITAL FUNDING, INC.; JP
MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; BANK OF
AMERICA, NA; and FEDERAL DEPOSIT
INSURANCE CORPORATION;
Defendants.

14

/

15
On December 5, defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation filed a motion to

16
17

dismiss the complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due

18

December 19. No opposition or response has been received. By order dated January 2, plaintiff,

19

who is represented by counsel, was ordered to file a response by noon on January 7. That

20

deadline has come and gone. Plaintiff is hereby ordered a second time to show cause why the

21

motion to dismiss should not be granted. As previously warned, failure to timely respond may

22

result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff’s response is due by JANUARY 14, 2013, AT

23
24

NOON.

This is the final warning. The hearing date, currently scheduled for February 7, 2013,

shall remain in place.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 10, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE