Innovation Ventures LLC et al v. Pittsburg Wholesale Grocers Inc et al
ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 209 MOTION to Strike United Custom Distribution, LLC's Affirmative Defenses, 86 MOTION for Sanctions , 125 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Or Sta y Pitco Foods' Pending Motion for Sanctions, 226 First MOTION to Dismiss the Elite Defendants' Cross-Claims, 189 MOTION to Strike Santa Monica Distributing, Manouchehr Heikali and Aziz Heikali's Affirmative Def enses, 229 MOTION for Joinder AS TO THE DANDEE CROSS-DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS CROSS-CLAIMS MADE BY THE ELITE DEFENDANTS, 228 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Request for Order Changing Time., Motions terminate d: 228 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Request for Order Changing Time filed by Innovation Ventures LLC, Living Essentials LLC. Motion Hearing set for 4/18/2013 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 13, 2013.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC, et al.,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 12-05523 WHA
PITTSBURG WHOLESALE GROCERS,
INC., et al.,
The parties request a change in schedule due to motion hearings falling on a religious
holiday. Pitco’s motion for sanctions (Dkt. No. 86), Living Essentials’ motion to dismiss or stay
proceedings (Dkt. No. 125), Living Essentials’ motion to strike Santa Monica Distributing’s
affirmative defenses (Dkt. No. 189), Living Essentials’ motion to strike United Custom
Distribution’s affirmative defenses (Dkt. No. 209), and Dan-Dee’s motion to dismiss cross
claims (Dkt. No. 226) will all be RESCHEDULED and heard on the same day: APRIL 18 AT
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 13, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?