Innovation Ventures LLC et al v. Pittsburg Wholesale Grocers Inc et al

Filing 304

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY ADAM BLUMENKRANTZ by Hon. William Alsup denying 239 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 12-5523 WHA

Plaintiffs,
v.

14

PITTSBURG WHOLESALE GROCERS,
et al.,

15

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
VICE APPLICATION OF
ATTORNEY ADAM
BLUMENKRANTZ

Defendants.
/

16
17

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Adam Blumenkrantz (Dkt. No. 239) is DENIED

18

for failing to specify membership in good standing of a specific United States Court or the

19

highest court of another State or the District of Columbia. Merely claiming membership of “the

20

bar of the New York” is insufficient under the civil local rules. While the application fee does

21

not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is

22

submitted.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: April 8, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2