Innovation Ventures LLC et al v. Pittsburg Wholesale Grocers Inc et al

Filing 402

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE CORRESPONDENCE by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 392 Motion for Leave to File.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 William A. Markham, State Bar No. 132970 Dorn Graham Bishop, State Bar No. 147994 Rashida Khan, California State Bar No. 196420 Jason Eliaser, State Bar No. 248394 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM MARKHAM, P.C. 550 West C Street, Suite 2040 San Diego, CA 92101 6 Tel: Fax: E-mail: (619) 221-4400 (619) 224-3974 wm@markhamlawfirm.com 7 Attorneys for Defendant Dan-Dee Company, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 Vs. 15 16 17 PITTSBURGH WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC. d/b/a PITCO FOODS, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 12-cv-5523-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING DAN-DEE COMPANY, INC. TO FILE SPECIFIED MEET-AND-CONFER LETTERS Civil L.R. 7-11 The Hon. William H. Alsup Courtroom 8, 19th Floor Complaint Filed: Trial Date: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING DAN-DEE COMPANY, INC. TO FILE SPECIFIED MEET-AND-CONFER LETTERS October 26, 2012 January 13, 2014 1 WHEREAS, Defendant Dan-Dee Company, Inc. (“Dan-Dee”) has filed an administrative 2 motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 for leave to file certain meet-and-confer correspondence 3 exchanged between Plaintiffs and Dan-Dee – namely, a letter that Plaintiffs’ counsel sent to Dan- 4 Dee’s counsel on May 31, 2013 and a reply letter that Dan-Dee’s counsel sent to Plaintiffs’ counsel 5 on June 27, 2013; and 6 WHEREAS, Dan-Dee seeks leave to file the correspondence on the ground that the Court 7 might wish to consider it before ruling on the pending discovery dispute between Dan-Dee and 8 Plaintiffs (Docket No.391); and 9 WHEREAS, the Court finds that there is good cause to receive the above correspondence; 10 WHEREFORE, the Court now gives the following ORDER: 11 Dan-Dee is given leave to file the above correspondence, which is appended as Exhibits 1 and IT IS SO ORDERED. S Judge W RT 19 A DERED O OR The Honorable William H. Alsup D IT IS S United States District DIFIE S MO Judge 21 up ls illiam A ER H 20 R NIA 18 DATED: July 1, 2013. June , 2013 FO 17 NO 16 RT U O 15 S DISTRICT TE C TA LI 14 A 13 2 to its present administrative motion. Dan-Dee's request for leave to submit additional briefing on the discovery dispute, however, is DENIED. UNIT ED 12 N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING DAN-DEE COMPANY, INC. TO FILE SPECIFIED MEET-AND-CONFER LETTERS -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?