Innovation Ventures LLC et al v. Pittsburg Wholesale Grocers Inc et al

Filing 477

REMINDER NOTICE OF UPCOMING TRIAL (1/13,2014) AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1/6/2014). Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/21/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Plaintiffs,

No. C 12-05523 WHA

v.

14

PITTSBURG WHOLESALE GROCERS,
INC., et al.,

15

Defendants.

REMINDER NOTICE OF
UPCOMING TRIAL AND FINAL
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
/

16
17
18

This notice serves as a friendly reminder that this case remains set for a FINAL
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on JANUARY 6, 2014,

at 2:00 P.M., with a JURY TRIAL on

19

JANUARY 13, 2014. Please consult the existing case management order and review and follow

20

all standing guidelines and orders of the undersigned for civil cases on the Court’s website at

21

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Continuances will rarely be granted.

22

The final pretrial conference will be an important event, for it will be there that the

23

shape of the upcoming trial will be determined, including in limine orders, time limits and

24

exhibit mechanics. Lead trial counsel must attend.

25

To avoid any misunderstanding with respect to the final pretrial conference and trial,

26

the Court wishes to emphasize that all filings and appearances must be made — on pain of

27

dismissal, default or other sanction — unless and until a dismissal fully resolving the case is

28

received. It will not be enough to inform the clerk that a settlement in principle has been

1

reached or to lodge a partially executed settlement agreement or to lodge a fully executed

2

agreement (or dismissal) that resolves less than the entire case. Where, however, a

3

fully-executed and unconditional settlement agreement clearly and fully disposing of the entire

4

case is lodged reasonably in advance of the pretrial conference or trial and only a ministerial

5

act remains, the Court will arrange a status conference to work out an alternate procedure

6

pending a formal dismissal.

7
8
9

Please state whether the Court can be of further ADR assistance (but avoid stating
offers, counteroffers or dollar amounts).
In this case, the Court wishes to consider the following additional trial procedures and
desires that counsel meet and confer and reach a stipulation concerning whether and how to

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

use them:

12

1.

Scheduling opposing experts so as to appear in successive order;

13

2.

Giving preliminary instructions on the law;

14

3.

Allowing limited pre-closing deliberations (as per, e.g., Rule 39

15

of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure); and

16

4.

Allowing each side fifteen minutes of opening/argument time to

17

be used during the evidence time (in addition to normal opening statement and

18

closing argument).

19

Please present the results of your stipulation (or not) in the joint pretrial conference

20

submissions.

21
22
23
24
25

Dated: October 21, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
2