Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al

Filing 180

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 179 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Continuance of Litigation Activities, Including Notice of Conditional Certification of Collective Action, Pending Anticipated Settlement and Motion for Court Approval of Same filed by Chris Van Pelt, Crowdflower, Inc., Lukas Biewald. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 22, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ARTHUR M. EIDELHOCH, Bar No. 168096 aeidelhoch@littler.com GALEN M. LICHTENSTEIN, Bar No. 251274 glichtenstein@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, California 94108.2693 Telephone: 415.433.1940 Facsimile: 415.399.8490 JACQUELINE E. KALK (Pro Hac Vice) jkalk@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 80 South 8th Street, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55402.2136 Telephone: 612-313-7645 Facsimile: 612.677.3139 KELLY D. REESE (Pro Hac Vice) kreese@littler.com R. BRADLEY ADAMS (Pro Hac Vice) radams@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 63 South Royal Street, Suite 901 Mobile, AL 36602.3218 Telephone: 251-432-2477 Facsimile: 251-432-0427 Attorneys for Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD AND CHRIS VAN PELT 17 William T. Payne (SBN 90988) Ellen M. Doyle (Pro Hac Vice) Edward J. Feinstein (Pro Hac Vice) STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE PAYNE & KRAVEC, LLC 429 Forbes Avenue, 17th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15219 412-281-8400 (T), 412-281-1007 (F) wpayne@stemberfeinstein.com edoyle@stemberfeinstein.com efeinstein@stemberfeinstein.com Mark A. Potashnick (Pro Hac Vice) WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 133 St. Louis, MO 63141 314-997-9150 (T), 314-997-9170 (F) markp@wp-attorney.com Ira Spiro (SBN 67641) Jennifer Connor (SBN 241480) Justin F. Marquez (SBN 262417) SPIRO MOORE, LLP 11377 W. Olympic Blvd., 5th Floor Los Angeles, CA 89064 310-235-2468 (T), 310-235-2456 (F) ira@spiromoore.com Jennifer@spiromoore.com Justin@spiromoore.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER OTEY, MARY GRETH & THE CONDITOINALLY CERTIFIED FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION CLASS 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 22 CHRISTOPHER OTEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF LITIGATION ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTION, PENDING ANTICIPATED SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR COURT APPROVAL OF SAME 23 Plaintiff, 24 v. 25 26 27 Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-JST/mej CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD and CHRIS VAN PELT, Defendant. [PROPOSED] ORDER 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE LITIGATION ACTIVITIES OF Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-JST 1 Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER OTEY and MARY GRETH ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants 2 CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD and CHRIS VAN PELT ("Defendants"), by and 3 through their respective counsel, hereby enter into the following Stipulation Regarding Continuance 4 of Litigation Activities Pending Anticipated Settlement and Motion for Court Approval of Same. 5 Specifically, by and through this Stipulation, the parties request that the Court grant the parties leave 6 to continue all litigation activities, including responses to pending discovery requests and 7 service/posting of notice of conditional certification of collective action, for an additional thirty days 8 (from October 31, 2013) to allow the parties to continue to work toward a final settlement of the 9 instant action in the wake of the parties' mediation which occurred October 18-19, 2013. 10 STIPULATION 11 12 1. Defendants CrowdFlower, Inc., Lukas Biewald and Chris Van Pelt. 13 14 2. 17 No case management conference has yet occurred and the Court has not yet issued any scheduling order. 15 16 The original Complaint in this action was filed on October 26, 2012 against 3. The initial case management conference is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on December 11, 4. The parties participated in mediation on October 18-19, 2013. In anticipation of 2013. 18 mediation, the parties sought and the Court granted a stay, pending mediation, up to and including 19 October 31, 2013. (Doc. No. 177). 20 5. Based on the mediation and subsequent settlement discussions, counsel for the parties 21 believe that finalizing a settlement of this action is likely. However, given the complex nature of 22 this putative collective and class action, additional time is needed by the parties to try to finalize all 23 of the terms of a settlement agreement. The parties desire to focus their efforts on reaching a final 24 settlement rather than devoting time, effort and expense to engaging in litigation activities. 25 6. The parties therefore seek a continuance of all litigation activities, including all 26 activities associated with discovery and providing notice of conditional certification of a collective 27 action (e.g., posting and servicing notice), for an additional thirty days, up through and including 28 November 30, 2013. The parties further seek an automatic extension of the continuance, in the event LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE LITIGATION ACTIVITIES OF 2. Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-JST 1 that the parties finalize a proposed settlement and file a motion for Court approval of same prior to 2 November 30, 2013, until such time as the Court rules on that motion. 3 7. The continuance sought will help facilitate settlement. 4 8. If settlement is not achieved, the continuance sought will not materially delay or alter 5 the progress of this litigation. 6 WHEREFORE, the parties mutually request that the Court enter the proposed Order below, 7 thereby continuing the deadlines for all litigation activities, including responding to pending 8 discovery requests and serving/posting notice of conditional certification of collective action, up to 9 and including November 30, 2013 or, if a motion for Court approval of settlement is filed prior to 10 that time, until such time as the Court rules on said motion. 11 12 Dated: October 22, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 13 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 14 By: 15 16 17 18 19 /s/ R. Bradley Adams R. BRADLEY ADAMS (pro hac vice) ARTHUR M. EIDELHOCH GALEN M. LICHTENSTEIN JACQUELINE E. KALK (pro hac vice) KELLY D. REESE (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD AND CHRIS VAN PELT 20 21 Dated: October 22, 2013 WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK 22 By: 23 24 25 /s/ Mark Potashnick MARK POTASHNICK Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER OTEY, MARY GRETH and the conditionally certified FLSA collection action class 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE LITIGATION ACTIVITIES OF 3. Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-JST 1 PROPOSED ORDER 2 3 Good cause appearing therefore, the foregoing Stipulation Re: Continuance of Litigation 4 Activates Pending Anticipated Settlement and Motion for Court Approval of Same ("Stipulation") is 5 hereby approved and it is hereby ORDERED that: 6 All litigation activities, including responses to pending discovery requests and 7 service/posting of notice of conditional certification of collective action, are continued up to and 8 including November 30, 2013. It is further order that in the event that the parties reach a final 9 settlement and file a motion for Court approval of same on or before November 30, 2013, this 10 11 continuance shall be automatically extended until such time as the Court rules on the motion. PURSUANT TO STIPUATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 Dated: October 22, 2013 ____________________________________________ HONORABLE JON. S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE LITIGATION ACTIVITIES OF Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?