Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al

Filing 209

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 207 MOTION for Settlement filed by Christopher Otey, Mary Greth. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 21, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRISTOPHER OTEY, et al., Case No. 12-cv-05524-JST Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 CROWDFLOWER, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Re: ECF No. 207 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Approval of Parties' Modified FLSA Collective 13 Action Settlement, Final Collective Action Certification for Settlement Purposes Only, and 14 Authorization for the Parties to Effectuate Their Settlement. ECF No. 207. Pursuant to Federal 15 Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the matter is 16 suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for 17 October 30, 2014, is hereby VACATED. 18 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 19 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 21 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 22 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 23 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 24 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 21, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?