Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al
Filing
209
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 207 MOTION for Settlement filed by Christopher Otey, Mary Greth. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 21, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CHRISTOPHER OTEY, et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-05524-JST
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
CROWDFLOWER, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
Re: ECF No. 207
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Approval of Parties' Modified FLSA Collective
13
Action Settlement, Final Collective Action Certification for Settlement Purposes Only, and
14
Authorization for the Parties to Effectuate Their Settlement. ECF No. 207. Pursuant to Federal
15
Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the matter is
16
suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for
17
October 30, 2014, is hereby VACATED.
18
However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
19
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
20
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
21
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
22
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
23
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
24
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?