Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al

Filing 217

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 216 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER - Joint Stipulation for a 7-Day Extension of Time to File New Motion for Settlement Approval and Request to Vacate Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order filed by Chris Van Pelt, Crowdflower, Inc., Lukas Biewald Further Case Management Conference set for 4/15/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 6, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 William T. Payne (SBN 90988) Ellen M. Doyle (Pro Hac Vice) Edward J. Feinstein (Pro Hac Vice) FEINSTEIN DOYLE PAYNE & KRAVEC, LLC 429 Forbes Avenue, 17th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15219 412-281-8400 (T), 412-281-1007 (F) wpayne@fdpklaw.com edoyle@fdpklaw.com efeinstein@fdpklaw.com 7 8 9 10 11 M ILLER L AW G ROUP A P R OF E SS I ON AL C O RP OR A T IO N C AL IF O RN I A 12 13 Mark A. Potashnick (Pro Hac Vice) WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 133 St. Louis, MO 63141 314-997-9150 (T), 314-997-9170 (F) markp@wp-attorney.com Tracy Thompson (SBN 88173) tt@millerlawgroup.com M. Michael Cole (SBN 235538) mmc@millerlawgroup.com MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. (415) 464-4300 Fax (415) 464-4336 Attorneys for Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD, and CHRIS VAN PELT Ira Spiro (SBN 67641) SPIRO LAW CORP. 10573 West Pico Blvd., #865 Los Angeles, CA 90064 310-235-2350 (T) ira@spirolawcorp.com 14 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER OTEY, MARY GRETH & THE CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION CLASS 17 18 19 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 CHRISTOPHER OTEY & MARY GRETH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 22 situated, 23 Plaintiff, 24 v. 25 CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD AND CHRIS VAN PELT, 26 Case No.: 3:12-cv-05524-JST/MEJ JOINT STIPULATION FOR A 7-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NEW MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND REQUEST TO VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED ORDER] Complaint filed: October 26, 2012 27 Defendant(s). 28 JOINT STIP. FOR A 7-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NEW MOT. FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND REQUEST TO VACATE CMC AND [PROPOSED ORDER] Case No.: 3:12-cv-05524-JST/MEJ 1 Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER OTEY and MARY GRETH (“Plaintiffs”) and 2 Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD, and CHRIS VAN PELT 3 (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby enter into the following Joint 4 Stipulation for a 7-Day Extension of Time to File New Motion for Settlement Approval. 5 Specifically, by and through this Stipulation, the parties request that the Court continue the 6 parties’ deadline for filing a renewed motion for settlement approval, up to and including 7 April 8, 2015. 8 9 STIPULATION 1. On December 16, 2014, this Court denied Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of 10 Proposed Settlement without prejudice. (Doc. 210.) 11 2. By Order dated February 13, 2015, the Court permitted the Plaintiffs to file a M ILLER L AW G ROUP A P R OF E SS I ON AL C O RP OR A T IO N C AL IF O RN I A 12 new motion for settlement approval by March 18, 2015. 13 3. The Court further vacated the Case Management Conference set for March 14 11, 2015, and set a Case Management Conference for April 8, 2015 in the event that 15 Plaintiffs do not file their Motion for Settlement Approval by March 18. 16 4. By Order dated March 13, 2015, the Court permitted the Plaintiffs to file a new 17 motion for settlement approval by April 1, 2015, with a Case Management Conference set 18 for April 8, 2015, in the event the Plaintiffs did not file their Motion for Settlement Approval 19 by April 1. 20 5. The parties have now reached agreement on the terms of a revised settlement 21 agreement which address the concerns expressed by the Court in the December 16, 2014, 22 Order, but request a further brief extension so as to collect signatures, conform the 23 necessary exhibits to the revised settlement agreement, and finalize their briefs in support of 24 the new proposed agreement. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 JOINT STIP. FOR A 7-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NEW MOT. FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND REQUEST TO VACATE CMC AND [PROPOSED ORDER] Case No.: 3:12-cv-05524-JST/MEJ 1 Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for submission be 2 extended by 7 days to April 8, 2015; that the April 8, 2015, date currently set for the Case 3 Management Conference be vacated; and that a Case Management Conference be set for 4 a later date. 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 Dated: April 1, 2015 Dated: April 1, 2015 7 WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 8 9 10 11 M ILLER L AW G ROUP A P R OF E SS I ON AL C O RP OR A T IO N C AL IF O RN I A 12 By: /s/ Mark A. Potashnick Mark Potashnick Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER OTEY, MARY GRETH and the conditionally FLSA collective action class By: /s/ Tracy Thompson Tracy Thompson Attorneys for Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD, and CHRIS VAN PELT 13 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER 15 Good cause appearing, the foregoing Joint Stipulation for a 7-Day Extension 16 of Time to File New Motion for Settlement Approval is hereby approved, and it is hereby 17 ordered that: 18 1. Plaintiffs may file a new motion for settlement approval by April 8, 2015; 19 2. The Case Management Conference currently set for April 8, 2015 is vacated; 20 3. In the event Plaintiffs do not file a motion by April 8, 2015, a Case 2:00 p.m. April 15 21 Management Conference is set for ________________, 2015 at_________. 22 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 24 25 Dated: April 6, 2015 26 HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 4844-7860-9442, v. 1 2 JOINT STIP. FOR A 7-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NEW MOT. FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND REQUEST TO VACATE CMC AND [PROPOSED ORDER] Case No.: 3:12-cv-05524-JST/MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?