Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al
Filing
217
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 216 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER - Joint Stipulation for a 7-Day Extension of Time to File New Motion for Settlement Approval and Request to Vacate Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order filed by Chris Van Pelt, Crowdflower, Inc., Lukas Biewald Further Case Management Conference set for 4/15/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 6, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
William T. Payne (SBN 90988)
Ellen M. Doyle (Pro Hac Vice)
Edward J. Feinstein (Pro Hac Vice)
FEINSTEIN DOYLE PAYNE
& KRAVEC, LLC
429 Forbes Avenue, 17th Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
412-281-8400 (T), 412-281-1007 (F)
wpayne@fdpklaw.com
edoyle@fdpklaw.com
efeinstein@fdpklaw.com
7
8
9
10
11
M ILLER L AW G ROUP
A P R OF E SS I ON AL C O RP OR A T IO N
C AL IF O RN I A
12
13
Mark A. Potashnick (Pro Hac Vice)
WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK
11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 133
St. Louis, MO 63141
314-997-9150 (T), 314-997-9170 (F)
markp@wp-attorney.com
Tracy Thompson (SBN 88173)
tt@millerlawgroup.com
M. Michael Cole (SBN 235538)
mmc@millerlawgroup.com
MILLER LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation
111 Sutter Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel. (415) 464-4300
Fax (415) 464-4336
Attorneys for Defendants
CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD,
and CHRIS VAN PELT
Ira Spiro (SBN 67641)
SPIRO LAW CORP.
10573 West Pico Blvd., #865
Los Angeles, CA 90064
310-235-2350 (T)
ira@spirolawcorp.com
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CHRISTOPHER OTEY, MARY GRETH &
THE CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED FLSA
COLLECTIVE ACTION CLASS
17
18
19
20
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
21 CHRISTOPHER OTEY & MARY GRETH, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
22 situated,
23
Plaintiff,
24 v.
25 CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD
AND CHRIS VAN PELT,
26
Case No.: 3:12-cv-05524-JST/MEJ
JOINT STIPULATION FOR A 7-DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NEW
MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
AND REQUEST TO VACATE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
[PROPOSED ORDER]
Complaint filed: October 26, 2012
27
Defendant(s).
28
JOINT STIP. FOR A 7-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NEW MOT. FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND
REQUEST TO VACATE CMC AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
Case No.: 3:12-cv-05524-JST/MEJ
1
Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER OTEY and MARY GRETH (“Plaintiffs”) and
2 Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD, and CHRIS VAN PELT
3 (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby enter into the following Joint
4 Stipulation for a 7-Day Extension of Time to File New Motion for Settlement Approval.
5 Specifically, by and through this Stipulation, the parties request that the Court continue the
6 parties’ deadline for filing a renewed motion for settlement approval, up to and including
7 April 8, 2015.
8
9
STIPULATION
1.
On December 16, 2014, this Court denied Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of
10 Proposed Settlement without prejudice. (Doc. 210.)
11
2.
By Order dated February 13, 2015, the Court permitted the Plaintiffs to file a
M ILLER L AW G ROUP
A P R OF E SS I ON AL C O RP OR A T IO N
C AL IF O RN I A
12 new motion for settlement approval by March 18, 2015.
13
3.
The Court further vacated the Case Management Conference set for March
14 11, 2015, and set a Case Management Conference for April 8, 2015 in the event that
15 Plaintiffs do not file their Motion for Settlement Approval by March 18.
16
4.
By Order dated March 13, 2015, the Court permitted the Plaintiffs to file a new
17 motion for settlement approval by April 1, 2015, with a Case Management Conference set
18 for April 8, 2015, in the event the Plaintiffs did not file their Motion for Settlement Approval
19 by April 1.
20
5.
The parties have now reached agreement on the terms of a revised settlement
21 agreement which address the concerns expressed by the Court in the December 16, 2014,
22 Order, but request a further brief extension so as to collect signatures, conform the
23 necessary exhibits to the revised settlement agreement, and finalize their briefs in support of
24 the new proposed agreement.
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28
1
JOINT STIP. FOR A 7-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NEW MOT. FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND
REQUEST TO VACATE CMC AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
Case No.: 3:12-cv-05524-JST/MEJ
1
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for submission be
2 extended by 7 days to April 8, 2015; that the April 8, 2015, date currently set for the Case
3 Management Conference be vacated; and that a Case Management Conference be set for
4 a later date.
5 Respectfully submitted,
6 Dated: April 1, 2015
Dated: April 1, 2015
7 WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK
MILLER LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation
8
9
10
11
M ILLER L AW G ROUP
A P R OF E SS I ON AL C O RP OR A T IO N
C AL IF O RN I A
12
By:
/s/ Mark A. Potashnick
Mark Potashnick
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CHRISTOPHER OTEY, MARY GRETH
and the conditionally FLSA collective
action class
By:
/s/ Tracy Thompson
Tracy Thompson
Attorneys for Defendants
CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS
BIEWALD, and CHRIS VAN PELT
13
14
[PROPOSED] ORDER
15
Good cause appearing, the foregoing Joint Stipulation for a 7-Day Extension
16 of Time to File New Motion for Settlement Approval is hereby approved, and it is hereby
17 ordered that:
18
1.
Plaintiffs may file a new motion for settlement approval by April 8, 2015;
19
2.
The Case Management Conference currently set for April 8, 2015 is vacated;
20
3.
In the event Plaintiffs do not file a motion by April 8, 2015, a Case
2:00 p.m.
April 15
21 Management Conference is set for ________________, 2015 at_________.
22
23
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
24
25 Dated:
April 6, 2015
26
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
4844-7860-9442, v. 1
2
JOINT STIP. FOR A 7-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NEW MOT. FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND
REQUEST TO VACATE CMC AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
Case No.: 3:12-cv-05524-JST/MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?