Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al
Filing
223
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 218 MOTION for Settlement filed by Christopher Otey, Mary Greth. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 19, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
CHRISTOPHER OTEY, et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-05524-JST
Plaintiffs,
5
ORDER VACATING HEARING
v.
6
7
CROWDFLOWER, INC., et al.,
Re: ECF No. 218
Defendants.
8
9
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Parties’ Second Modified FLSA
Collective Action Settlement, Final Collective Action Certification for Settlement Purposes Only,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Authorization for the Parties to Effectuate Their Settlement, and Request for Tolling. ECF No.
12
218. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court
13
finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter,
14
currently scheduled for May 28, 2015, is hereby VACATED.
15
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
16
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
17
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
18
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
19
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
20
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
21
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 19, 2015
_____________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?