Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al

Filing 223

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 218 MOTION for Settlement filed by Christopher Otey, Mary Greth. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 19, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 CHRISTOPHER OTEY, et al., Case No. 12-cv-05524-JST Plaintiffs, 5 ORDER VACATING HEARING v. 6 7 CROWDFLOWER, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 218 Defendants. 8 9 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Parties’ Second Modified FLSA Collective Action Settlement, Final Collective Action Certification for Settlement Purposes Only, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Authorization for the Parties to Effectuate Their Settlement, and Request for Tolling. ECF No. 12 218. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court 13 finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, 14 currently scheduled for May 28, 2015, is hereby VACATED. 15 If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 16 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 17 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 18 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 19 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 20 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 21 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 19, 2015 _____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?