Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al

Filing 236

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 230 MOTION for Settlement Joint Notice of Amended Motion and Motion to Modify Court's July 2, 2015 Order Granting Motion For Approval of Parties' Second Modified FLSA Collective Action Settlement filed by Chris Van Pelt, Crowdflower, Inc., Lukas Biewald. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 13, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 CHRISTOPHER OTEY, et al., Case No. 12-cv-05524-JST Plaintiffs, 5 ORDER VACATING HEARING v. 6 7 CROWDFLOWER, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 230 Defendants. 8 9 Before the Court is a Joint Motion to Modify Court's July 2, 2015 Order Granting Motion for Approval of Parties' Second Modified FLSA Collective Action Settlement. ECF No. 230. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the 12 matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently 13 scheduled for January 21, 2016, is hereby VACATED. 14 If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 15 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 16 been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 17 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 18 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 19 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 20 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 13, 2016 _____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?