Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al
Filing
236
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 230 MOTION for Settlement Joint Notice of Amended Motion and Motion to Modify Court's July 2, 2015 Order Granting Motion For Approval of Parties' Second Modified FLSA Collective Action Settlement filed by Chris Van Pelt, Crowdflower, Inc., Lukas Biewald. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 13, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
CHRISTOPHER OTEY, et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-05524-JST
Plaintiffs,
5
ORDER VACATING HEARING
v.
6
7
CROWDFLOWER, INC., et al.,
Re: ECF No. 230
Defendants.
8
9
Before the Court is a Joint Motion to Modify Court's July 2, 2015 Order Granting Motion
for Approval of Parties' Second Modified FLSA Collective Action Settlement. ECF No. 230.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the
12
matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently
13
scheduled for January 21, 2016, is hereby VACATED.
14
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
15
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
16
been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
17
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
18
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
19
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
20
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 13, 2016
_____________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?