Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al
Filing
76
ORDER granting 74 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Hearing and Briefing Dates for Pending Motions filed by Chris Van Pelt, et al. Reset Hearing as to 71 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings P's Notice of Motion and Motio n for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, 44 MOTION to Bifurcate Defendants' Motion and Memorandum of Law to Bifurcate Discovery and to Stay Merits/Class Certification Discovery and Motions, 46 MOTION to Certify Class [PLA INTIFFS MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL COLLECTIVE ACTION Motion Hearing set for 4/19/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Case Management Statement due by 4/12/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/19/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/22/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
Case3:12-cv-05524-CRB Document74 Filed03/19/13 Page2 of 3
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
CHRISTOPHER OTEY, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
v.
CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS
BIEWALD and CHRIS VAN PELT,
9
Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: HEARING AND BRIEFING
DATES FOR PENDING MOTIONS
Civil Local Rule 6-2
Defendants.
10
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the undersigned, counsel of record for Plaintiff
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Christopher Otey (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CrowdFlower, Inc., Lukas Biewald, and Chris Van
Pelt (collectively “Defendants”), do hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1.
The initial case management conference in this action has been set for Friday, April
12, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
California. Due to scheduling conflicts, Counsel are unable to attend on that date and have conferred
and cleared their respective calendars for April 19, 2013.
2.
That the following matters currently scheduled for hearing on April 12, 2013 at 10:00
a.m. be continued to April 19, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.: (a) the initial case management conference,
(b) hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Bifurcate Discovery and to Stay Merits/Class Certification
Discovery and (c) Motions, and hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings.
3.
That Defendants be provided a two-week extension, to and including April 5, 2013, to
file an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings.
4.
That Plaintiff’s deadline to file a Reply in support of his Motion for Partial Judgment
on the Pleadings is extended until April 12, 2013.
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIP/[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
HEARING/BRIEFING FOR MOTIONS
No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ)
Case3:12-cv-05524-CRB Document74 Filed03/19/13 Page3 of 3
1
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated: March 19, 2013
3
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
4
/s/ Jacqueline E. Kalk
JACQUELINE E. KALK
ARTHUR M. EIDELHOCH
GALEN M. LICHTENSTEIN
KELLY D. REESE
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants
CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD
AND CHRIS VAN PELT
5
6
7
8
9
Dated: March 19, 2013
10
STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE PAYNE &
KRAVEC, LLC
12
/s/ Mark A. Potashnick
MARK A. POTASHNICK
WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK
Attorneys for Plaintiff
13
CHRISTOPHER OTEY
11
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
15
March 22, 2013
Dated: __________________
UNIT
ED
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
.
D
HONORABLE CHARLES REBREYER
RDE R.
RT
21
J
ER
H
22
23
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
20
FO
19
R NIA
IS SO O
IT DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UNITED STATES
18
LI
16
A
14
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIP/[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
HEARING/BRIEFING FOR MOTIONS
No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?