Otey v. Crowdflower, Inc. et al

Filing 76

ORDER granting 74 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Hearing and Briefing Dates for Pending Motions filed by Chris Van Pelt, et al. Reset Hearing as to 71 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings P's Notice of Motion and Motio n for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, 44 MOTION to Bifurcate Defendants' Motion and Memorandum of Law to Bifurcate Discovery and to Stay Merits/Class Certification Discovery and Motions, 46 MOTION to Certify Class [PLA INTIFFS MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL COLLECTIVE ACTION Motion Hearing set for 4/19/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Case Management Statement due by 4/12/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/19/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/22/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-05524-CRB Document74 Filed03/19/13 Page2 of 3 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 CHRISTOPHER OTEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 6 7 8 v. CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD and CHRIS VAN PELT, 9 Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING AND BRIEFING DATES FOR PENDING MOTIONS Civil Local Rule 6-2 Defendants. 10 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the undersigned, counsel of record for Plaintiff 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Christopher Otey (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CrowdFlower, Inc., Lukas Biewald, and Chris Van Pelt (collectively “Defendants”), do hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. The initial case management conference in this action has been set for Friday, April 12, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Due to scheduling conflicts, Counsel are unable to attend on that date and have conferred and cleared their respective calendars for April 19, 2013. 2. That the following matters currently scheduled for hearing on April 12, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. be continued to April 19, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.: (a) the initial case management conference, (b) hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Bifurcate Discovery and to Stay Merits/Class Certification Discovery and (c) Motions, and hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. 3. That Defendants be provided a two-week extension, to and including April 5, 2013, to file an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. 4. That Plaintiff’s deadline to file a Reply in support of his Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings is extended until April 12, 2013. 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIP/[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING/BRIEFING FOR MOTIONS No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ) Case3:12-cv-05524-CRB Document74 Filed03/19/13 Page3 of 3 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: March 19, 2013 3 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 4 /s/ Jacqueline E. Kalk JACQUELINE E. KALK ARTHUR M. EIDELHOCH GALEN M. LICHTENSTEIN KELLY D. REESE LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD AND CHRIS VAN PELT 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: March 19, 2013 10 STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE PAYNE & KRAVEC, LLC 12 /s/ Mark A. Potashnick MARK A. POTASHNICK WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 CHRISTOPHER OTEY 11 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 15 March 22, 2013 Dated: __________________ UNIT ED 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S . D HONORABLE CHARLES REBREYER RDE R. RT 21 J ER H 22 23 . Breyer arles R udge Ch NO 20 FO 19 R NIA IS SO O IT DISTRICT COURT JUDGE UNITED STATES 18 LI 16 A 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIP/[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING/BRIEFING FOR MOTIONS No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?