Khan et al v. K2 Pure Solutions, LP

Filing 137

ORDER granting Joint Dismissal. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/08/2014. All remaining claims and causes of action of all parties are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 TROY A. VALDEZ, State Bar No. 191478 ERIN M. DOYLE, State Bar No. 233113 SHEILA A. KHAN-VARIBA, State Bar No. 219434 VALDEZ NOOR TODD & DOYLE LLP 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1450 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (415) 202-5950 Facsimile: (415) 202-5951 Email: tvaldez@vsnlaw.com Email: edoyle@vsnlaw.com Email: skhan-variba@vsnlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants IMTIAZ KHAN, et al. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CHARLES S. BIRENBAUM, State Bar No. 107894 birenbaumc@gtlaw.com KORAY J. BULUT, State Bar No. 230298 bulutk@gtlaw.com GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 655-1300 Facsimile: (415) 707-2010 Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants K2 PURE SOLUTIONS L.P., et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IMTIAZ KHAN, an individual, TIM MORRIS, an individual, RICK SEISINGER, an individual, and NEELESH SHAH, an individual, ) Case No.: 12-CV-5526-WHO ) ) JOINT STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL ) )) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) K2 PURE SOLUTIONS, L.P., a Delaware ) limited partnership, K2 PURE SOLUTIONS ) NOCAL, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, ) K2 PURE SOLUTIONS PITTSBURG, L.P., a ) Delaware limited partnership, and DOES 1 ) through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) K2 PURE SOLUTIONS, L.P., a Delaware ) JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL United States District Court, Northern, Case No. 3:12-cv-05526-WHO limited partnership, 1 Counter-Claimant, 2 vs. 3 4 5 6 7 IMTIAZ KHAN, an individual, TIM MORRIS, an individual, RICK SEISINGER, an individual, and NEELESH SHAH, an individual Counter-Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Timothy M. Morris (“Morris”), Imtiaz Khan (“Khan”), 8 Rick Seisinger (“Seisinger”) and Neelesh Shah (“Shah”) (hereinafter jointly referred to as 9 “Plaintiffs”), by and through their attorneys of record, and Defendants and Counter-Claimants 10 K2 Pure Solutions, L.P., K2 Pure Solutions NoCal, L.P. and K2 Pure Solutions Pittsburg, L.P. 11 (hereinafter jointly referred to “Defendants”) (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) hereby 12 stipulate as follows: 13 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties, 14 through the undersigned counsel pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil 15 Procedure, that all Parties hereby stipulate to the dismissal of all remaining causes of actions and 16 claims brought forth in this litigation with prejudice. This dismissal includes all remaining 17 claims and causes of action in Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, and all remaining claims 18 and causes of action in Defendants’ First Amended Counter-Claim. Each party, accept as agreed 19 otherwise, shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to their respective 20 dismissed claims and causes of action. 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 22 23 Dated: August 8, 2014 VALDEZ TODD & DOYLE LLP 24 25 26 /s/ Troy A. Valdez TROY A. VALDEZ 27 28 -1JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL United States District Court, Northern, Case No. 3:12-cv-05526-WHO Attorneys for Plaintiffs IMTIAZ KHAN, TIM MORRIS, RICK SEISINGER and NEELESH SHAH 1 2 3 Dated: August 8, 2014 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 4 5 /s/ Koray J. Bulut KORAY J. BULUT 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants K2 PURE SOLUTIONS, L.P., K2 PURE SOLUTIONS NOCAL, L.P. AND K2 PURE SOLUTIONS PITTSBURG, L.P. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL United States District Court, Northern, Case No. 3:12-cv-05526-WHO 1 ORDER 2 3 Upon consideration of the foregoing Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Dismissal, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDER THAT all remaining claims and causes of action of all parties, including 5 those brought forth in Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint and Defendants’ First Amended 6 Counter-Claim are hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Parties, except as agreed otherwise, shall 7 bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 8 9 10 11 Dated: August 8, 2014 ____________________________ United States District Court Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL United States District Court, Northern, Case No. 3:12-cv-05526-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?