Khan et al v. K2 Pure Solutions, LP

Filing 137

ORDER granting Joint Dismissal. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/08/2014. All remaining claims and causes of action of all parties are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

TROY A. VALDEZ, State Bar No. 191478
ERIN M. DOYLE, State Bar No. 233113
SHEILA A. KHAN-VARIBA, State Bar No. 219434
VALDEZ NOOR TODD & DOYLE LLP
1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1450
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants
IMTIAZ KHAN, et al.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

CHARLES S. BIRENBAUM, State Bar No. 107894
[e-mail]
KORAY J. BULUT, State Bar No. 230298
[e-mail]
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants
K2 PURE SOLUTIONS L.P., et al.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IMTIAZ KHAN, an individual, TIM
MORRIS, an individual, RICK SEISINGER,
an individual, and NEELESH SHAH, an
individual,

) Case No.: 12-CV-5526-WHO
)
) JOINT STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL
)
))
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
K2 PURE SOLUTIONS, L.P., a Delaware
)
limited partnership, K2 PURE SOLUTIONS
)
NOCAL, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, )
K2 PURE SOLUTIONS PITTSBURG, L.P., a )
Delaware limited partnership, and DOES 1
)
through 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
K2 PURE SOLUTIONS, L.P., a Delaware
)
JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL
United States District Court, Northern, Case No. 3:12-cv-05526-WHO

limited partnership,
1
Counter-Claimant,
2
vs.
3
4
5
6
7

IMTIAZ KHAN, an individual, TIM
MORRIS, an individual, RICK SEISINGER,
an individual, and NEELESH SHAH, an
individual
Counter-Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Timothy M. Morris (“Morris”), Imtiaz Khan (“Khan”),

8

Rick Seisinger (“Seisinger”) and Neelesh Shah (“Shah”) (hereinafter jointly referred to as

9

“Plaintiffs”), by and through their attorneys of record, and Defendants and Counter-Claimants

10

K2 Pure Solutions, L.P., K2 Pure Solutions NoCal, L.P. and K2 Pure Solutions Pittsburg, L.P.

11

(hereinafter jointly referred to “Defendants”) (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) hereby

12

stipulate as follows:

13

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties,

14

through the undersigned counsel pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil

15

Procedure, that all Parties hereby stipulate to the dismissal of all remaining causes of actions and

16

claims brought forth in this litigation with prejudice. This dismissal includes all remaining

17

claims and causes of action in Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, and all remaining claims

18

and causes of action in Defendants’ First Amended Counter-Claim. Each party, accept as agreed

19

otherwise, shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to their respective

20

dismissed claims and causes of action.

21

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

22
23

Dated: August 8, 2014

VALDEZ TODD & DOYLE LLP

24
25
26

/s/ Troy A. Valdez
TROY A. VALDEZ

27
28

-1JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL
United States District Court, Northern, Case No. 3:12-cv-05526-WHO

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IMTIAZ KHAN, TIM MORRIS,
RICK SEISINGER and NEELESH SHAH

1
2
3

Dated: August 8, 2014

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

4
5

/s/ Koray J. Bulut
KORAY J. BULUT

6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants
K2 PURE SOLUTIONS, L.P., K2 PURE
SOLUTIONS NOCAL, L.P. AND K2 PURE
SOLUTIONS PITTSBURG, L.P.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL
United States District Court, Northern, Case No. 3:12-cv-05526-WHO

1
ORDER

2
3

Upon consideration of the foregoing Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Dismissal,

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDER THAT all remaining claims and causes of action of all parties, including

5

those brought forth in Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint and Defendants’ First Amended

6

Counter-Claim are hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Parties, except as agreed otherwise, shall

7

bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

8
9
10
11

Dated: August 8, 2014

____________________________
United States District Court Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3JOINT STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL
United States District Court, Northern, Case No. 3:12-cv-05526-WHO