Cassiman v. Petersen et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/11/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838
Email: [e-mail]
CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239
Email: [e-mail]
DIANE M. WALTERS, State Bar No. 148136
Email: [e-mail]
NAIRA DER KIUREGHIAN, State Bar No. 282391
Email: [e-mail]
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Defendants
Adam J. Epstein, Richard L. Hunter,
Russell J. Knittel, Ralph H. Schmitt, and
Nominal Defendant OCZ Technology Group,
Inc.

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

IN RE OCZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

17
18
19

This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EXTENSION OF TIME
LEAD CASE NO. C-12-05556-RS

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

LEAD CASE NO.: C-12-05556-RS
(Consolidated with Case Nos. C-1206058-RS, C-12-06343-RS)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDER
DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
DATE: N/A
TIME:
N/A
JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg

1

WHEREAS, on February 13, 2013, plaintiffs Ian Cassiman, Clair Vanderschaaf, and

2

Robert L. Morton filed a Verified Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint (the

3

“Complaint”) in the above-captioned action;

4
5
6
7

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation and order entered on March 25, 2013, the deadline
for defendants to respond to the Complaint was extended until April 22, 2013;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to schedule a private mediation on May 20, 2013 to
explore the possibility of a resolution of the above-captioned action;

8

WHEREAS, in light of the upcoming mediation, defendants have requested that the

9

deadline to respond to the Complaint be extended until three weeks after the May 20, 2013

10
11
12
13
14
15

mediation, or until June 10, 2013, and plaintiffs have agreed to defendants’ request;
WHEREAS, the requested extension is not for the purpose of delay and will not prejudice
any party;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the
undersigned, subject to Court approval, as follows:
1.

Defendants shall have until June 10, 2013 to respond to the Complaint.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EXTENSION OF TIME
LEAD CASE NO. C-12-05556-RS

-1-

1

Dated: April 11, 2013

2

Respectfully submitted,
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation

3
4

By: /s/

5
6

Diane M. Walters
Diane M. Walters
[e-mail]

650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendants Adam J. Epstein,
Richard L. Hunter, Russell J. Knittel, and
Ralph H. Schmitt and Nominal Defendant OCZ
Technology Group, Inc.

9
10
11
12

Dated: April 11, 2013

HOGAN LOVELLS LLP

13
By: /s/
14

Norman J. Blears
Norman J. Blears
[e-mail]

15

17

525 University Avenue 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

18

Attorneys for Arthur F. Knapp, Jr.

16

19
20

Dated: April 11, 2013

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

21
By: /s/
22

Daniel P. Lefler
Daniel P. Lefler
[e-mail]

23

25

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

26

Attorneys for Ryan Petersen

24

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EXTENSION OF TIME
LEAD CASE NO. C-12-05556-RS

-2-

1

Dated: April 11, 2013

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP

2
3

By: /s/

4
5

Travis E. Downs III
Travis E. Downs III
[e-mail]

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101-3301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
SHAWN A. WILLIAMS
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12
13

Dated: April 11, 2013

ROBBINS ARROYO LLP

14
By: /s/
15

George Aguilar
George Aguilar
[e-mail]

16
600 B Street, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17
18
19

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EXTENSION OF TIME
LEAD CASE NO. C-12-05556-RS

-3-

1

I, Diane M. Walters, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO

3

RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT. In

4

compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Norman J. Blears, Daniel P. Lefler,

5

Travis E. Downs III, and George Aguilar have concurred in this filing.

6
7

Dated: April 11, 2013

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation

8
9

By: /s/

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EXTENSION OF TIME
LEAD CASE NO. C-12-05556-RS

-4-

Diane M. Walters
Diane M. Walters
[e-mail]

1
2

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4 DATED: 4/11/13
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EXTENSION OF TIME
LEAD CASE NO. C-12-05556-RS

-5-