Wang v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al
Filing
98
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ALLOW NIR ZUK TO PROVIDE THE SCHEDULEDTECHNOLOGY TUTORIAL by Hon. William Alsup denying 96 Motion.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2013)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
QIANG WANG,
Plaintiff,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
v.
ORDER DENYING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
ALLOW NIR ZUK TO PROVIDE
THE SCHEDULED
TECHNOLOGY TUTORIAL
PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.,
NIR ZUK, and FENGMIN GONG,
Defendants.
/
13
14
No. C 12-05579 WHA
Defendants have filed an administrative motion to allow Nir Zuk, defendant and Chief
15
Technology Officer of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (“PAN”), to provide the technology tutorial
16
currently scheduled for February 12, 2014. Defendants have stated that if the motion is granted
17
(and plaintiff desires), defendants “would agree that Plaintiff could likewise have a person with
18
technical expertise (not a retained expert) present Plaintiff’s tutorial” (Dkt. No. 96).
19
Plaintiff opposes. Plaintiff argues that defendants’ proposal is not an equal exchange
20
because “Mr. Zuk has intimate knowledge of PAN’s Accused Systems and its non-infringement
21
positions, and Mr. Wang does not (given that the protective order bars him from viewing
22
essentially every technical document in this action)” (Dkt. No. 97).
23
The September 2013 order states “[a] tutorial for the Court (to be conducted by counsel
24
only, not experts) shall be set for February 12, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.” (Dkt. No. 94). Good cause has
25
not been shown to permit Nir Zir to conduct the technical tutorial. The motion is DENIED.
26
(This is an administrative motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-11; no reply is necessary.)
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 19, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?