Milliken & Company Inc v. Reynolds

Filing 66

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/12/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-05590-CRB Document65 Filed06/06/13 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 THOMAS M. MCINERNEY, State Bar No. 162055 tmm@ogletreedeakins.com SARAH R. NICHOLS, State Bar No. 233099 sarah.nichols@oglreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 442-4810 Facsimile: (415) 442-4870 JOHN C. GLANCY, D.C. Bar No. 74007 (Pro Hac Vice) john.glancy@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 300 North Main Street Post Office Box 2757 (29602) Greenville, South Carolina 29601 Telephone: (864) 271-1300 Facsimile: (864) 235-8806 Attorneys for Plaintiff MILLIKEN & COMPANY, INC. STEVEN M. CVITANOVIC, State Bar No. 168031 scvitanovic@hbblaw.com JESSICA LASSERE, State Bar No. 286724 jlassere@hbblaw.com HAIGHT, BROWN & BONESTEEL, LLP 71 Stevenson Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, California 74105-2981 Telephone: (415) 546-7500 Facsimile: (415) 546-7505 Attorneys for Defendant LINDA D. REYNOLDS 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MILLIKEN & COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:12-CV-05590 CRB JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER LINDA REYNOLDS, Defendant. 28 Case No. 3:12-CV-05590 CRB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case3:12-cv-05590-CRB Document65 Filed06/06/13 Page2 of 3 1 TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED COURT: 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil 3 Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1) by and between Plaintiff MILLIKEN & COMPANY, INC., and 4 Defendant LINDA D. REYNOLDS that this matter be dismissed, in its entirety, with prejudice. 5 The parties mutually agree to waive any and all claims for costs of suit or attorney's fees as a result 6 of this action. 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 8 9 Dated: June 6, 2013 10 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 11 By: 12 13 14 /s/ Sarah Nichols Thomas M. McInerney Sarah R. Nichols John C. Glancy Counsel for Plaintiff MILLIKEN & COMPANY, INC. 15 16 Dated: June 6, 2013 HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP 17 18 By: 19 20 /s/ Steven Cvitanovic Steven M. Cvitanovic Counsel for Defendant LINDA D. REYNOLDS 21 22 23 24 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. 25 26 DATED: June 6, 2013 By: /s/ Sarah R. Nichols Sarah R. Nichols 27 28 2 Case No. 3:12-CV-05590 CRB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case3:12-cv-05590-CRB Document65 Filed06/06/13 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice above, and good cause appearing therefore, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 5 This matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear her or its own attorney’s fees 6 and costs. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. S 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE yer s R. Bre e Charle Judg LI ER H 15 RT 13 FO NO 12 14 ERED O ORD R. BREYER HONORABLE CHARLES IT IS S R NIA Dated: June 12, 2013 15135863.2 A 10 RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED 8 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 3:12-CV-05590 CRB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?