Milliken & Company Inc v. Reynolds
Filing
66
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/12/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013)
Case3:12-cv-05590-CRB Document65 Filed06/06/13 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
THOMAS M. MCINERNEY, State Bar No. 162055
tmm@ogletreedeakins.com
SARAH R. NICHOLS, State Bar No. 233099
sarah.nichols@oglreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 442-4810
Facsimile:
(415) 442-4870
JOHN C. GLANCY, D.C. Bar No. 74007 (Pro Hac Vice)
john.glancy@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
300 North Main Street
Post Office Box 2757 (29602)
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
Telephone:
(864) 271-1300
Facsimile:
(864) 235-8806
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MILLIKEN & COMPANY, INC.
STEVEN M. CVITANOVIC, State Bar No. 168031
scvitanovic@hbblaw.com
JESSICA LASSERE, State Bar No. 286724
jlassere@hbblaw.com
HAIGHT, BROWN & BONESTEEL, LLP
71 Stevenson Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 74105-2981
Telephone:
(415) 546-7500
Facsimile:
(415) 546-7505
Attorneys for Defendant
LINDA D. REYNOLDS
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
MILLIKEN & COMPANY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:12-CV-05590 CRB
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
LINDA REYNOLDS,
Defendant.
28
Case No. 3:12-CV-05590 CRB
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case3:12-cv-05590-CRB Document65 Filed06/06/13 Page2 of 3
1
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED COURT:
2
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
3
Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1) by and between Plaintiff MILLIKEN & COMPANY, INC., and
4
Defendant LINDA D. REYNOLDS that this matter be dismissed, in its entirety, with prejudice.
5
The parties mutually agree to waive any and all claims for costs of suit or attorney's fees as a result
6
of this action.
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
8
9
Dated:
June 6, 2013
10
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
11
By:
12
13
14
/s/ Sarah Nichols
Thomas M. McInerney
Sarah R. Nichols
John C. Glancy
Counsel for Plaintiff
MILLIKEN & COMPANY, INC.
15
16
Dated:
June 6, 2013
HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP
17
18
By:
19
20
/s/ Steven Cvitanovic
Steven M. Cvitanovic
Counsel for Defendant
LINDA D. REYNOLDS
21
22
23
24
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatories.
25
26
DATED: June 6, 2013
By: /s/ Sarah R. Nichols
Sarah R. Nichols
27
28
2
Case No. 3:12-CV-05590 CRB
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case3:12-cv-05590-CRB Document65 Filed06/06/13 Page3 of 3
1
2
3
ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice above, and good cause appearing
therefore,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
5
This matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear her or its own attorney’s fees
6
and costs.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
yer
s R. Bre
e Charle
Judg
LI
ER
H
15
RT
13
FO
NO
12
14
ERED
O ORD R. BREYER
HONORABLE CHARLES
IT IS S
R NIA
Dated: June 12, 2013
15135863.2
A
10
RT
U
O
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
8
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 3:12-CV-05590 CRB
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?