Thought, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 187

Discovery Order re: 185 Joint Discovery Letter Brief Regarding Certain Discovery Requests Objections Made By Oracle. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/27/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

THOUGHT, INC.,

Case No. 12-cv-05601-WHO (MEJ)

Plaintiff,
8

DISCOVERY ORDER

v.

Re: Dkt. No. 185

9
10

ORACLE CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Plaintiff Thought, Inc. moves for an order compelling Defendant Oracle response to its

14

Requests for Production seeking financial information regarding all Oracle products from October

15

2006 to the present that were combined and distributed with the accused TopLink or EclipseLink

16

products. Jt. Ltr., Dkt. No. 185. However, discovery in this case closed on October 7, 2015. Dkt.

17

No. 166. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3, “no motions to compel discovery may be filed more

18

than 7 days after the discovery cut-off.” Accordingly, the undersigned magistrate judge is without

19

jurisdiction to consider Thought’s request.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: October 27, 2015
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge