Thought, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Defendants' Invalidity Contentions. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/18/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

James G. Gilliland, Jr. (SBN 107988)
Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith (SBN 197271)
Steven D. Moore (pro hac vice)
Robert J. Artuz (SBN 227789)
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Emails:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs
ORACLE CORPORATION, ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
AND ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Jeff D. Friedman (SBN 173886)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice)
Mark S. Carlson (Pro Hac Vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Emails:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant THOUGHT, INC.

19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20
21
22

THOUGHT, INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

23
24
25
26
27
28

v.

Civil Action No. C 12-5601 WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS

ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation; ORACLE AMERICA, INC. a
Delaware corporation; and ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a
California corporation,
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS’ INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. C 12-5601 WHO

-1-

1
2
3

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF
RECORD HEREIN:
WHEREAS the Parties have agreed to a new date of August 2, 2013, for Defendants to file

4

its Invalidity Contentions, as set forth in the proposed schedule included in Section VIII of the

5

Joint Case Management Statement, filed July 12, 2013 (Dkt. 37);

6

WHEREAS, as set forth in that proposed schedule, the Parties have agreed to extend other

7

dates related to Patent L.R. 3 and Patent L.R. 4, which dates had been adopted by the Court in this

8

case but which dates have not yet passed;

9

WHEREAS the Parties’ stipulation does not affect the currently scheduled Claim

10

construction tutorial or Claim construction hearing and does not accelerate or extend any other

11

time frames set in the Local Rules or in the Federal Rules;

12
13

IT IS STIPULATED by the parties that Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions are due on
August 2, 2013.
Respectfully submitted,

14
15

Dated: July 18, 2013

16

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
By: /s/ Mark S. Carlson
Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice)
Mark S. Carlson (pro hac vice)
Jeff D. Friedman (SBN 173886)

17
18
19

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Thought, Inc.

20
21
22
23
24
25

Dated: July 18, 2013

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
By: /s/ Robert J. Artuz
James G. Gilliland, Jr. (SBN 107988)
Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith (SBN 197271)
Steven D. Moore (pro hac vice)
Robert J. Artuz (SBN 227789)

26
27
28

Attorneys for Defendants
Oracle Corporation, Oracle America, Inc., and
Oracle International Corporation
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS’ INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. C 12-5601 WHO

-2-

Filer’s Attestation

1
2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Robert Artuz, hereby attests that the above-named
signatories concur in this filing.

3
DATED: July 18, 2013
/s/ Robert J. Artuz
Robert J. Artuz

4
5
6
7

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
Dated:__July 18, 2013____________
9
_______________________________________
HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
65563924V.1

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS’ INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. C 12-5601 WHO

-3-