Thought, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 57

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES re 56 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/12/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Jeff D. Friedman (173886)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice Application to be filed)
Mark S. Carlson (Pro Hac Vice Application to be filed)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Thought, Inc.

11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
THOUGHT, INC., a California corporation,
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
18
19

ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation; ORACLE AMERICA, INC, a
Delaware corporation; and ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a
California corporation

20
Defendants.
21

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. C12-5601 WHO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
AMEND SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES
NOTED FOR DECISION: November 8,
2013
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

22
23

In view of the Court’s order requiring Thought to reduce the number of asserted claims and

24

Oracle to reduce its asserted prior art references (Dkt. 50), the undersigned parties agree that it

25

would be appropriate to extend the deadlines for claim construction disclosures and related

26

deadlines provided by this Court’s scheduling order (Dkt. 40) and the Northern District of

27
28
005006-11 562854V1

1

California Patent Local Rules to take into account claim and prior art reductions. Accordingly, the

2

undersigned parties jointly request that the Court adopt the following disclosure deadlines:

3
4

1. November 12, 2013:

5
6

1(a).
2. November 15, 2013:

7
8

Parties must meet and confer for the purpose of limiting the
number of terms for construction. Patent L.R. 4-1(b).

3. November 22, 2013:

9
10

Exchange of proposed terms for construction. Patent L.R. 4-

Parties exchange proposed constructions, intrinsic evidence,
and extrinsic evidence. Patent L.R. 4-2(a)-(b).

4. December 4, 2013:

Parties meet and confer for the purposes of narrowing issues,

11

identifying the ten most important terms, and preparing the

12

joint claim construction statement. Patent L.R. 4-2(c).

13

5. December 11, 2013:

Joint claim construction statement. Patent L.R. 4-3.

14

6. December 20, 2013:

Close of claim construction discovery.

15

7. January 16, 2014:

Plaintiff’s opening claim construction brief. Patent L.R. 4-

16
17

5(a).
8. February 13, 2014:

18
19

Defendant’s opening claim construction brief. Patent L.R. 45(b).

9. February 28, 2013:

Plaintiff’s reply claim construction brief. Patent L.R. 4-5(c).

20
21

Respectfully submitted this 8th day of November, 2013.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2005006-11 562854V1

1

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

2

By /s/ Steve W. Berman
Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice)

3
Jeff D. Friedman (173886)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7

Mark S. Carlson (Pro Hac Vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Thought, Inc.

13
14

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

15

By /s/ Steven D. Moore
Steven D. Moore

16
JAMES G. GILLILAND, JR.
MEHRNAZ BOROUMAND SMITH
STEVEN D. MOORE
BENJAMIN M. KLEINMAN-GREEN
Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415 576 0200
Facsimile:
415 576 0300
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

ROBERT J. ARTUZ
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
650 326 2400
Facsimile:
650 326 2422
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
ORACLE CORPORATION, ORACLE AMERICA,
INC. and ORACLE INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION

24
25
26
27
28
005006-11 562854V1

-1-

1
2

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

3
4

Dated: November 12, 2013
_________________________________
HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2005006-11 562854V1

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

1
2

Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i) of the Civil Local Rules for the Northern District of California, I,

3

Steve W. Berman, attest that Steven D. Moore has concurred in the filing of this document, per

4

email communications dated November 8, 2013.

5

DATED: November 8, 2013.

6
/s/ Steve W. Berman
Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice)

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3005006-11 562854V1

1
2

PROOF OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on November 8, 2013, foregoing document was electronically filed

3

using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the email addresses

4

registered in the CM/ECF system, as denoted on the Electronic Mail Notice List. Any non-

5

CM/ECF participants will be served by electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery.

6
7

/s/ Steve W. Berman
Steve W. Berman

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4005006-11 562854V1