Thought, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 58

ORDER re 54 MOTION for Reconsideration. The Court is inclined to GRANT the motion for clarification. If Thought wishes to comment on that motion or the Court's current intention, Thought shall file a response of no more than five (5) pages on or before Wednesday November 20, 2013. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/14/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

THOUGHT, INC.,

Case No. 12-cv-05601-WHO (WHO)

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

ORACLE CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER RE MOTION FOR
CLARIFICATION OR
RECONSIDERATION
Re: Dkt. No. 54

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Currently before the Court is Oracle’s motion for clarification or reconsideration of the

13

Court’s October 10, 2013 Order Limiting Claims (Docket No. 50). The Court is inclined to

14

GRANT the motion for clarification and to clarify that “a prior art instrumentality (such as a

15

device or process) and associated references that describe that instrumentality shall count

16

as one reference, as shall the closely related work of a single prior artist.”

17

To date, plaintiff has not responded to Oracle’s motion. If Thought wishes to comment on

18

that motion or the Court’s current intention, Thought shall file a response of no more than five (5)

19

pages on or before Wednesday November 20, 2013.

20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 14, 2013
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge