Pace et al v. Bonham et al

Filing 21

ORDER Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/8/13 is continued to 5/10/2013 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/28/13., Motions terminated: 19 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER continuing Case Management Conference filed by Stafford Lehr, Charlton H. Bonham. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California ROBERT W. BYRNE TRACY L. WINSOR Supervising Deputy Attorneys General RUSSELL B. HILDRETH (SBN 166167) MARC N. MELNICK (SBN 168187) Deputy Attorneys General 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor P.O. Box 70550 Oakland, CA 94612-0550 Telephone: (510) 622-2133 Fax: (510) 622-2270 E-mail: Marc.Melnick@doj.ca.gov Russell.Hildreth@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Charlton H. Bonham and Stafford Lehr 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 FELICE PACE; WILDERNESS WATCH, v. Case No. C-12-5610-SI-NJV Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Courtroom: Judge: Trial Date: Defendants. Action Filed: CHARLTON H. BONHAM; STAFFORD LEHR, 10 Honorable S. Illston None Set November 1, 2012 20 21 22 Plaintiffs Felice Pace and Wilderness Watch and Defendants Charlton H. Bonham and 23 Stafford Lehr hereby stipulate to and respectfully request that the Court continue the Case 24 Management Conference currently set for February 8, 2013, at 2:30 p.m., for approximately 25 ninety (90) days, for the following reasons. 26 Defendants’ time to respond to the amended complaint runs on January 28, 2013. 27 Defendants intend to file a motion to dismiss. The parties agree that the issues in this case are 28 largely, if not exclusively, issues of law, which can be decided on that motion to dismiss. If the 1. STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (No. C-12-5610-SI-NJV) 1 Court grants the motion to dismiss, this case will be completed. If the Court denies the motion, 2 its determination will likely assist the parties in focusing this litigation. The parties also seek to 3 avoid the time, effort, and expense of preparing a joint case management statement, attending the 4 case management conference, and providing initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 5 Procedure 26(a)(1). 6 On January 17, 2013, the parties submitted their Notice of Need for ADR Phone 7 Conference, requesting an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge. The parties are 8 willing to continue on that process, as the Court wishes. 9 Therefore, Plaintiffs Felice Pace and Wilderness Watch and Defendants Charlton H. 10 Bonham and Stafford Lehr hereby stipulate to continue the Case Management Conference 11 currently set for February 8, 2013, at 2:30 p.m., until May 10, 2013, or another date in early May 12 2013 that is convenient for the Court. 13 Dated: January 28, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 16 JULIA A. OLSON Attorney for Plaintiffs Felice Pace and Wilderness Watch 17 18 19 Dated: January 28, 2013 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California ROBERT W. BYRNE TRACY L. WINSOR Supervising Deputy Attorneys General RUSSELL B. HILDRETH Deputy Attorney General 20 21 22 23 /s/ Marc N. Melnick 24 MARC N. MELNICK Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Charlton H. Bonham and Stafford Lehr 25 26 27 28 2. STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (No. C-12-5610-SI-NJV) 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Case Management 2 10 Conference is continued from February 8, 2013, at 2:30 p.m., to May __, 2013, at 2:30 p.m. 3 DATED: 1/28/13 4 ___________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 5 6 7 OK2011202302 90287236.doc 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (No. C-12-5610-SI-NJV)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?