Pich v. Astrue

Filing 10

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/30/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SAM PICH, Plaintiff, 12 No. C 12-05626 JSW v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 13 Defendant. 14 / ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES 15 16 In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to 17 reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final 18 judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). Plaintiff has already indicated his consent. Defendant is 19 hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than February 8, 2013, as to whether it 20 consents to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant action.1 For 21 the parties’ convenience, consent forms are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint case management statement filed in connection with a case management conference. Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case management conference has not been scheduled. 1 1 “Forms” section. The parties are further advised that they may jointly request assignment to a 2 specific magistrate judge. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: January 30, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?