Eagleston v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 23

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 22 Case Management Statement. The Case Management Conference is rescheduled for 1/28/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. The Court emphasizes that the parties must complete the mediation prior to the Case Management Conference. No further extension will be permitted. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/25/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICHARD A. EAGLESTON, Case No. 12-cv-05633-WHO Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendants. In Defendant's Updated Case Management Conference Statement, defendant requests on 13 behalf of the parties a continuance of the Case Management Conference for a date in late January 14 or February, 2014 so that the parties can mediate their dispute. The parties have already received 15 one 120 day extension to hold the mediation, but state that "unavoidable scheduling and staffing 16 conflicts" interfered with the mediation that date and that they have a new date for the mediation 17 scheduled for January 8, 2014, but that plaintiff may have to change that date. 18 The Court grants the parties' request and reschedules the Case Management Conference for 19 January 29, 2014 at 2 p.m. The Court emphasizes that the parties must complete the mediation 20 prior to the Case Management Conference. They have had ample time to mediate and no further 21 extension will be permitted. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 25, 2013 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?