Nextdoor.com, Inc. v. Abhyanker
Filing
237
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 234 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 217 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Bruno Tarabichi, Heather Norton, Scott Allen, Roy Montgomery and Brian Orion Stipulation to Advance Hearing Date filed by Raj Abhyanker, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 234 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 217 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Bruno Tarabichi, Heather Norton, Scott Allen, Roy Montgomery and Brian Orion Stipulation to Advance Hearing Date , 217 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Bruno Tarabichi, Heather Norton, Scott Allen, Roy Montgomery and Brian Orion. Responses due by 6/27/2014. Replies due by 7/2/2014. Motion Hearing reset for 7/10/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/23/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BRUNO W. TARABICHI, CA State Bar No. 215129
bruno@legalforcelaw.com
HEATHER R. NORTON, CA State Bar No. 257014
heather@legalforcelaw.com
SCOTT J. ALLEN, CA State Bar No. 178925
scott@legalforcelaw.com
LEGALFORCE RAJ ABHYANKER, P.C.
1580 W. El Camino Real, Suite 13
Mountain View, California 94040
Telephone: 650.965.8731
Facsimile: 650.989.2131
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
Raj Abhyanker
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
NEXTDOOR.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
v.
RAJ ABHYANKER, an individual,
Case No.: 3:12-cv-05667-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO ADVANCE HEARING FOR
COUNSELS’ MOTION TO WITHDRAW
Case Filed: November 5, 2012
Judge: Honorable Edward M. Chen
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On June 11, 2014, Counsel for Defendant Raj Abhyanker “(Abhyanker”) filed a Motion to
Withdraw as Counsel and Request for an Ex Parte In Camera Hearing (the “Motion”). [Dkt.
217]. The hearing date was initially set for July 17, 2014. On June 13, 2014, the Court issued a
notice moving the hearing date to July 24, 2014. [Dkt. 222].
Defendant Abhyanker is unavailable on July 24, 2014, as is Abhyanker’s lead counsel
Bruno Tarabichi. Accordingly, Plaintiff Nextdoor.com, Inc. (“Nextdoor.com”) and Defendant
Raj Abhyanker (“Abhyanker”), through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, and
request the Court to enter, the following Order advancing the hearing date on the Motion to July
-1-
STIPULATION TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE
3:12-cv-05667-EMC
1
10, 2014. By so stipulating, Nextdoor.com does not waive, and hereby expressly reserves, its
2
right to oppose the motion or ask for certain conditions to be imposed to ensure Abhyanker’s
3
compliance with his discovery and other obligations in this case.
4
5
Stipulated and agreed to this 19th day of June 2014.
6
7
/s/ Heather R. Norton
Bruno W. Tarabichi
Heather R. Norton
Scott J. Allen
Attorneys for Defendant
Raj Abhyanker
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
/s/ Jennifer Kelly
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterdefendant Nextdoor.com, Inc.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE
3:12-cv-05667-EMC
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
3
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1. An ex parte in camera hearing will be held on the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel on July
10, 2014 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor before Hon. Judge Edward M. Chen.
2. Responses due by June 27, 2014. Replies due by July 2, 2014.
3. Nextdoor.com reserves its right to oppose the motion or request conditions be imposed to
ensure Abhyanker’s compliance with any and all of his discovery obligations in this
action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
UNIT
ED
17
S
23rd
ENTERED this _________ day of June, 2014.
RT
U
O
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
hen
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud
18
NO
19
RT
20
FO
16
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
6
hereby orders, adjudges and decrees that:
H
ER
LI
5
In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court
21
22
A
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE
3:12-cv-05667-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?