Nextdoor.com, Inc. v. Abhyanker

Filing 237

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 234 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 217 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Bruno Tarabichi, Heather Norton, Scott Allen, Roy Montgomery and Brian Orion Stipulation to Advance Hearing Date filed by Raj Abhyanker, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 234 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 217 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Bruno Tarabichi, Heather Norton, Scott Allen, Roy Montgomery and Brian Orion Stipulation to Advance Hearing Date , 217 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Bruno Tarabichi, Heather Norton, Scott Allen, Roy Montgomery and Brian Orion. Responses due by 6/27/2014. Replies due by 7/2/2014. Motion Hearing reset for 7/10/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/23/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BRUNO W. TARABICHI, CA State Bar No. 215129 bruno@legalforcelaw.com HEATHER R. NORTON, CA State Bar No. 257014 heather@legalforcelaw.com SCOTT J. ALLEN, CA State Bar No. 178925 scott@legalforcelaw.com LEGALFORCE RAJ ABHYANKER, P.C. 1580 W. El Camino Real, Suite 13 Mountain View, California 94040 Telephone: 650.965.8731 Facsimile: 650.989.2131 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Raj Abhyanker UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 NEXTDOOR.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 v. RAJ ABHYANKER, an individual, Case No.: 3:12-cv-05667-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ADVANCE HEARING FOR COUNSELS’ MOTION TO WITHDRAW Case Filed: November 5, 2012 Judge: Honorable Edward M. Chen Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On June 11, 2014, Counsel for Defendant Raj Abhyanker “(Abhyanker”) filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and Request for an Ex Parte In Camera Hearing (the “Motion”). [Dkt. 217]. The hearing date was initially set for July 17, 2014. On June 13, 2014, the Court issued a notice moving the hearing date to July 24, 2014. [Dkt. 222]. Defendant Abhyanker is unavailable on July 24, 2014, as is Abhyanker’s lead counsel Bruno Tarabichi. Accordingly, Plaintiff Nextdoor.com, Inc. (“Nextdoor.com”) and Defendant Raj Abhyanker (“Abhyanker”), through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, and request the Court to enter, the following Order advancing the hearing date on the Motion to July -1- STIPULATION TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE 3:12-cv-05667-EMC 1 10, 2014. By so stipulating, Nextdoor.com does not waive, and hereby expressly reserves, its 2 right to oppose the motion or ask for certain conditions to be imposed to ensure Abhyanker’s 3 compliance with his discovery and other obligations in this case. 4 5 Stipulated and agreed to this 19th day of June 2014. 6 7 /s/ Heather R. Norton Bruno W. Tarabichi Heather R. Norton Scott J. Allen Attorneys for Defendant Raj Abhyanker 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 /s/ Jennifer Kelly FENWICK & WEST LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Nextdoor.com, Inc. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATION TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE 3:12-cv-05667-EMC 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1. An ex parte in camera hearing will be held on the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel on July 10, 2014 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor before Hon. Judge Edward M. Chen. 2. Responses due by June 27, 2014. Replies due by July 2, 2014. 3. Nextdoor.com reserves its right to oppose the motion or request conditions be imposed to ensure Abhyanker’s compliance with any and all of his discovery obligations in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 UNIT ED 17 S 23rd ENTERED this _________ day of June, 2014. RT U O DERED O OR IT IS S HON. EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE hen rd M. C ge Edwa Jud 18 NO 19 RT 20 FO 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 6 hereby orders, adjudges and decrees that: H ER LI 5 In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court 21 22 A 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE 3:12-cv-05667-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?