Love v. Permanente Medical Group et al
Filing
113
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 112 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/15/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2013)
5
JUSTICE FIRST, LLP
Jenny C. Huang, SBN 223596
Briana Cummings, SBN 285002
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 628-0695
Email: jhuang@justicefirstllp.com
bcummings@justicefirstllp.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Love
7
MARION’S INN, LLP
Mark Palley, SBN 120073
David M. Rosenberg-Wohl, SBN 132924
Tanya G. Cecena, SBN 285186
1611 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 707
Oakland, CA 94612-2415
Telephone: (510) 451-6770
E-mail: mp@marionsinn.com
drw@marionsinn.com
tgc@marionsinn.com
1
2
3
4
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Defendants Kaiser Foundation
Hospitals, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.,
The Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
ROBIN LOVE,
21
Plaintiff,
22
23
24
25
vs.
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS,
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN,
THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP,
AND DOES 1-10, inclusive,
26
Defendants.
)
) Case No.: 12-cv-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
)
) AMENDED STIPULATED
) PROTECTIVE ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
27
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 1 OF 19
1
2
1.
3
4
PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of
confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public
5
6
7
8
9
disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.
Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following
Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket
protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from
10
public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to
11
confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge that
12
this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal;
13
Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62 set forth the procedures that must be followed and
14
the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material
15
under seal.
16
2.
17
DEFINITIONS
2.1
Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of
18
information or items under this Order.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2.2
“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is
generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 26(c).
2.3
Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as
well as their support staff).
2.4
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that
26
it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
27
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”.
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 2 OF 19
1
2.5
Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the
2
medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,
3
testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or
4
responses to discovery in this matter.
5
6
7
8
9
2.6
the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or
as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s
competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party
or of a Party’s competitor.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to
2.7
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or
Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another
Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by
less restrictive means.
2.8
House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House
Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
2.9
Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.10
Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this
20
action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this
21
action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of
22
that party.
23
24
25
26
27
2.11
Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,
consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).
2.12
Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery
Material in this action.
2.13
Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 3 OF 19
1
(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and
2
organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and
3
subcontractors.
4
5
2.14
“CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
6
7
Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as
2.15
Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a
Producing Party.
8
9
3.
10
SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material
11
(as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2)
12
all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,
13
conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.
14
15
16
17
However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following
information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a
Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as
a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to
the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure
from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality
to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate
agreement or order.
4.
DURATION
25
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by
26
this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court
27
order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 4 OF 19
1
claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after
2
the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this
3
action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time
4
pursuant to applicable law.
5
5.
6
7
8
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party
or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care
to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.
9
10
11
12
13
14
To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only
those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so
that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is
not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are
15
shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to
16
unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary
17
expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.
18
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated
19
for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection
20
initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is
21
withdrawing the mistaken designation.
22
23
24
25
26
27
5.2
Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order
(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,
Disclosure or Discovery
Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated
before the material is disclosed or produced.
Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 5 OF 19
1
(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but
2
excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing
3
Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
4
EYES ONLY” to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the
5
6
7
8
material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the
protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for
each portion, the level of protection being asserted.
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection
9
need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which
10
11
12
13
14
material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all
of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants
copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof,
15
qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the
16
Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
17
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) to each page that contains Protected
18
Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the
19
Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate
20
markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being
21
asserted.
22
(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the
23
Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other
24
proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of protection being asserted. When it is
25
26
27
impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection and it
appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Designating
Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding is
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 6 OF 19
1
concluded) a right to have up to 21 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to
2
which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted. Only those
3
portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall
4
be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Alternatively, a Designating
5
6
7
8
Party may specify, at the deposition or up to 21 days afterwards if that period is properly
invoked, that the entire transcript shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing
9
or other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only
10
11
12
13
14
15
authorized individuals who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
(Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition
shall not in any way affect its designation as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page
16
that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all
17
pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material
18
and the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall
19
inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the
20
expiration of a 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been
21
designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless
22
otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as
23
actually designated.
24
25
26
27
(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other
tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the
container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. If only a portion or portions
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 7 OF 19
1
of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall
2
identify the protected portion(s) and specify the level of protection being asserted.
3
4
5
6
7
5.3
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to
designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s
right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a
designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is
treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.
8
9
10
6.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1
Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of
11
confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality
12
designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic
13
burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to
14
15
16
17
challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the
original designation is disclosed.
6.2
Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution
process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis
18
19
20
21
22
for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written
notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this
specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in
good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other
23
forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In
24
conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality
25
designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the
26
designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered,
27
to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 8 OF 19
1
stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or
2
establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in
3
a timely manner.
4
6.3
5
6
7
8
Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court
intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under
Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if
applicable) within 21 days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties
agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier.
9
Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant
10
11
12
13
14
has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure
by the Designating Party to make such a motion including the required declaration within 21
days (or 14 days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each
challenged designation. In addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a
15
confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge
16
to the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought
17
pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the
18
movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding
19
paragraph.
20
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating
21
Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose
22
unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to
23
sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to
24
file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the
25
material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s
26
designation until the court rules on the challenge.
27
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 9 OF 19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
7.
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1
Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed
or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for
prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be
disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order.
When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of
section 13 below (FINAL DISPOSITION).
8
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and
9
10
11
12
13
14
in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.
7.2
Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise
ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may
disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees
15
of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information
16
for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that
17
is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
18
(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving
19
Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
20
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
21
(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is
22
reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and
23
Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
24
25
26
27
(d) the court and its personnel;
(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and Professional
Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 10 OF 19
1
(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably
2
necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit
3
A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of
4
transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be
5
6
7
8
separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted
under this Stipulated Protective Order.
(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or
other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
9
7.3
Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
10
11
12
13
14
Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the
Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:
(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees
15
of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information
16
for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that
17
is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
18
(b) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this
19
litigation, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A),
20
and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4(a)(2), below, have been followed];
21
(c) the court and its personnel;
22
(d) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and Professional
23
Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
24
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and
25
26
(e) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or
other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
27
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 11 OF 19
1
2
7.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items to Designated House Counsel or Experts.
3
(a)(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the Designating
4
Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to Designated House Counsel any information or item that
5
has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” pursuant to
6
7
8
paragraph 7.3(b) first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) sets forth the
full name of the Designated House Counsel and the city and state of his or her residence, and (2)
describes the Designated House Counsel’s current and reasonably foreseeable future primary job
9
duties and responsibilities in sufficient detail to determine if House Counsel is involved, or may
10
11
12
13
14
become involved, in any competitive decision-making.
(a)(2) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the Designating
Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any information or
item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
15
pursuant to paragraph 7.3(c) first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1)
16
identifies the general categories of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
17
ONLY” information that the Receiving Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert, (2) sets
18
forth the full name of the Expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (3)
19
attaches a copy of the Expert’s current resume, (4) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s),
20
(5) identifies each person or entity from whom the Expert has received compensation or funding
21
for work in his or her areas of expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional
22
services, including in connection with a litigation, at any time during the preceding five years,
23
and (6) identifies (by name and number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any
24
litigation in connection with which the Expert has offered expert testimony, including through a
25
26
27
declaration, report, or testimony at a deposition or trial, during the preceding five years.
(b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the preceding
respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified Designated
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 12 OF 19
1
House Counsel or Expert unless, within 30 days of delivering the request, the Party receives a
2
written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the
3
grounds on which it is based.
4
5
6
7
8
(c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the
Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by
agreement within seven days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party
seeking to make the disclosure to Designated House Counsel or the Expert may file a motion as
provided in Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order
9
62, if applicable) seeking permission from the court to do so. Any such motion must describe the
10
11
12
13
14
circumstances with specificity, set forth in detail the reasons why the disclosure to Designated
House Counsel or the Expert is reasonably necessary, assess the risk of harm that the disclosure
would entail, and suggest any additional means that could be used to reduce that risk. In addition,
any such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration describing the parties’ efforts
15
to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the meet and confer
16
discussions) and setting forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal to
17
approve the disclosure.
In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to Designated House Counsel or
18
19
the Expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail
20
(under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected
21
Material to its Designated House Counsel or Expert.
22
23
24
25
8.
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN
OTHER LITIGATION
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels
26
disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
27
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”:
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 13 OF 19
1
2
(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a
copy of the subpoena or court order;
3
4
5
(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the
other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this
Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and
6
7
(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the
Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
8
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the
9
subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as
10
11
12
13
14
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” before a
determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has
obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and
expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these
15
provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to
16
disobey a lawful directive from another court.
17
18
9.
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN
THIS LITIGATION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(a)
The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in
this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with
this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these
provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.
(b)
In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a
26
Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement
27
with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall:
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 14 OF 19
1
1. promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that
2
some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-
3
Party;
4
5
6
2. promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective
Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of
the information requested; and
7
3. make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.
8
(c)
If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within 14
9
days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party
timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its
possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a
determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the
burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.
10.
17
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
18
19
20
21
22
Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated
Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating
Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of
the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were
23
made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the
24
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
25
26
11.
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
PROTECTED MATERIAL
27
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 15 OF 19
1
produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the
2
Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This
3
provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery
4
order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of
5
6
7
8
Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a
communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product
protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order
submitted to the court.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
12.
MISCELLANEOUS
12.1
Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to
seek its modification by the court in the future.
12.2
Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective
Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any
information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly,
no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material
covered by this Protective Order.
18
19
20
21
22
12.3
Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party
or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in
the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any
Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62. Protected
23
Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the
24
specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, a
25
sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is
26
privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a
27
Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 16 OF 19
1
5(d) and General Order 62 is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the Protected
2
Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by
3
the court.
4
5
6
13.
FINAL DISPOSITION
Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4,
7
each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such
8
material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,
9
compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected
10
Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must
11
submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the
12
Designating Party) by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all
13
the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has
14
15
16
17
not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or
capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to
retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts,
legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected
Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to
this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Dated: October 3, 2013
Oakland, California
JUSTICE FIRST, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robin Love
By:
________/s/_Jenny Huang_______
Jenny C. Huang
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300
Oakland, CA 94612
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 17 OF 19
1
Dated: October 11, 2013
Oakland, California
2
3
4
MARION’S INN, LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
By:
________/s/ Mark Palley________
Mark Palley
1611 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 707
Oakland, CA 94612
5
6
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: October 15, 2013
9
_____________________________________
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 18 OF 19
1
EXHIBIT A
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3
I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________
4
5
6
7
8
[print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and
understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California on [date] in the case of LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION
HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR). I agree to comply with and to be
bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that
9
failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I
10
11
12
13
14
solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to
this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the
provisions of this Order.
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
15
Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated
16
Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.
17
I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of
18
_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone
19
number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any
20
proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.
21
22
Date: _________________________________
23
City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________
24
25
26
27
Printed name: ______________________________
[printed name]
Signature: __________________________________
[signature]
28
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
LOVE V. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL., CASE NO. 12-CV-05679 (WHO)(DMR)
PAGE 19 OF 19
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?