Love v. Permanente Medical Group et al

Filing 129

ORDER TO CLARIFY REMAINING DISPUTES IN JOINT DISCOVERY LETTERS 106 110 . It appears that the parties may not have finished meeting and conferring about the discovery disputes at issue. The parties are therefore ordered to finish any outstandi ng meet and confer sessions immediately, then file a joint letter by 5:00 p.m. on November 12, 2013, clearly indicating which of the discovery disputes raised in the joint discovery letters remain at issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 11/07/13. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 ROBIN LOVE, 12 13 Plaintiff(s), v. 14 ORDER TO CLARIFY REMAINING DISPUTES IN JOINT DISCOVERY LETTERS [DOCKET NO. 106, 110] THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, 15 No. C-12-05679 DMR Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 16 17 Before the court are two joint discovery letters filed by Plaintiff and Defendants. [Docket 18 Nos. 106, 110.] From the letters, it appears that the parties may not have finished meeting and 19 conferring about the discovery disputes at issue. The parties are therefore ordered to finish any 20 outstanding meet and confer sessions immediately, then file a joint letter by 5:00 p.m. on November 21 12, 2013, clearly indicating which of the discovery disputes raised in the joint discovery letters 22 remain at issue. The parties may not raise additional disputes not previously raised. Following the 23 hearing on the joint discovery letters on November 14, 2013, lead counsel shall be prepared to meet 24 and confer in the courthouse regarding any remaining discovery disputes. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 7, 2013 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?