Fluidigm Corporation v. Nanostring Technologies, Inc.

Filing 36

ORDER DENYING STIPULATED REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME AND REFERRING DISCOVERY DISPUTE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/19/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 12-5712 RS FLUIDIGM CORPORATION, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING STIPULATED REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME AND REFERRING DISCOVERY DISPUTE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE v. 13 14 NANOSTRING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 15 Defendant. ____________________________________/ 16 17 The parties’ stipulated request for an order permitting defendant’s “motion to protect 18 confidentiality” to be heard on September 19, 2013, is denied. The motion represents a discovery 19 dispute that should have been presented in the manner specified by paragraph 4 of the Case 20 Management Scheduling Order entered on February 7, 2013 (Dkt. No. 18). Defendant’s motion and 21 the associated sealing motion (Dkt. Nos. 34 and 33) and any further discovery disputes in this action 22 are hereby referred to a magistrate judge for disposition. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: 8/19/13 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?