Fluidigm Corporation v. Nanostring Technologies, Inc.
Filing
36
ORDER DENYING STIPULATED REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME AND REFERRING DISCOVERY DISPUTE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/19/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 12-5712 RS
FLUIDIGM CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING STIPULATED
REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME AND
REFERRING DISCOVERY DISPUTE
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
v.
13
14
NANOSTRING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
15
Defendant.
____________________________________/
16
17
The parties’ stipulated request for an order permitting defendant’s “motion to protect
18
confidentiality” to be heard on September 19, 2013, is denied. The motion represents a discovery
19
dispute that should have been presented in the manner specified by paragraph 4 of the Case
20
Management Scheduling Order entered on February 7, 2013 (Dkt. No. 18). Defendant’s motion and
21
the associated sealing motion (Dkt. Nos. 34 and 33) and any further discovery disputes in this action
22
are hereby referred to a magistrate judge for disposition.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: 8/19/13
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?