Doe et al v. Harris et al
Filing
62
STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Page Limitation for Plaintiffs' Reply. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/03/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
MICHAEL T. RISHER (SB# 191627)
mrisher@aclunc.org
LINDA LYE (SB# 215584)
llye@aclunc.org
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC.
39 Drumm Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 621-2493
Facsimile: (415) 255-8437
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
HANNI FAKHOURY (SB# 252629)
hanni@eff.org
LEE TIEN (SB# 148216)
tien@eff.org
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: (415) 436-9333
Facsimile: (415) 436-9993
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JOHN DOE, et al.
on behalf of themselves and others similarly
situated
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
JOHN DOE, et al., on behalf of themselves and )
)
others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
KAMALA D. HARRIS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
Civil Case No. 3:12-CV-05713-TEH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING PAGE
LIMITATION FOR PLAINTIFFS
REPLY
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Page Limitation for
Plaintiffs Reply
Case No.: 3:12-cv-05713-TEH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
WHEREAS, the proponents of Proposition 35, Chris Kelly and Daphne Phung, have sought
leave to intervene in this action as defendants;
WHEREAS, Defendant Kamala Harris and Proposed Intervenors Kelly and Phung have
each filed separate opposition briefs, see Dkts. 54 & 55;
WHEREAS, the two opposition briefs together total 40 pages, in excess of the 25-page
limit established in Local Rule 7-4(b);
WHEREAS, as required by Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer attests that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories;
9
THEREFORE, Plaintiffs, Defendant Harris, and Proposed Intervenors hereby stipulate that
10
Plaintiffs may file a reply brief of up to 20 pages, notwithstanding the 15-page limit established in
11
Local Rule 7-4(b).
12
13
DATED: November 30, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
14
/s/ Michael T. Risher
15
By:
16
Michael T. Risher
Linda Lye
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA, INC.
39 Drumm Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 621-2493
Facsimile: (415) 255-8437
17
18
19
20
21
Hanni Fakhoury
Lee Tien
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: (415) 436-9333
Facsimile: (415) 436-9993
22
23
24
25
26
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JOHN DOE, et al., on behalf of themselves
27
28
1
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Page Limitation for
Plaintiffs Reply
Case No.: 3:12-cv-05713-TEH
and others similarly situated
1
By: /s/ Robert D. Wilson
2
Kamala Harris
Attorney General of California
Peter K. Southworth
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Robert D. Wilson
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box. 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 327-7870
Facsimile: (916) 324-8835
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant Kamala Harris
11
By: /s/ Karen Getman
12
James C. Harrison
Karen Getman
Margaret R. Prinzing
REMCHO, JOHANSEN & PURCELL
201 Dolores Ave
San Leandro, CA 94577
Telephone: (510) 346-6200
Facsimile: (510) 346-6201
13
14
15
16
17
Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Chris
Kelly & Daphne Phung
18
19
[PROPOSED] ORDER
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs are hereby granted
leave to file a reply brief of up to 20 pages, notwithstanding the page limitation of Local Rule 74(b).
S DISTRIC
S
TC
NO
RT
26
nderson
e
on E. H
helt
Judge T
H
ER
27
FO
25
LI
24
R NIA
UNIT
ED
_________________________________
Judge Thelton E. Henderson
United States District Judge
23
28
TE
TA
RT
U
O
22
A
21
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Page Limitation for
Plaintiffs Reply
Case No.: 3:12-cv-05713-TEH
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?