Larson v. Trans Union , LLC
Filing
89
ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION IN RESPONSE TO ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL - allowing redaction of 80 Transcript. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/02/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BRIAN DOUGLAS LARSON,
Case No. 12-cv-05726-WHO
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
TRANS UNION , LLC,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION IN
RESPONSE TO ORDER DENYING
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
FILE UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 88
On June 26, 2015, I issued an order that, among other things, denied without prejudice
many of the sealing requests made by Trans Union in conjunction with the parties’ motions for
summary judgment and for class certification. Dkt. No. 86 at 25-27. On July 6, 2014, Trans
Union submitted a supplemental declaration in support of sealing. Dkt. No. 88. The declaration
substantially narrows Tran Union’s sealing requests and provides adequate justification for sealing
the information underlying those narrowed requests. Accordingly, the redacted documents
attached to the declaration, Dkt. No. 88 at Exs. A-H, may remain in the docket as is. The
numerical value on page 17, lines 11 to 12 of the transcript from the May 6, 2015 hearing (Dkt.
No. 80) shall be redacted from the public version and shall remain under seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 2, 2015
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?