Kaselitz et al v. Hisoft Technology International, Ltd et al
Filing
18
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS. Plaintiffs' opposition brief shall be filed by December 7, 2012, and hiSoft's reply brief shall be filed by December 21, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 29, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2012)
1 TED C. LINDQUIST, III (Cal. Bar No. 178523)
LINDQUISTLAW
2 100 Pine Street, Suite 2150
San Francisco, California 94111
3 Telephone: 415-399-1159
Facsimile: 866-255-4580
4 Email: tlindquist@lindquistlaw.com
5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ALANA KASELITZ and MELISSA KASELITZ
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11 ALANA KASELITZ, an individual; and
MELISSA KASELITZ, an individual,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
HISOFT TECHNOLOGY
15 INTERNATIONAL, LTD., a Cayman
Islands exempt company; TIAK KOON
16 LOH, an individual; and DOES 1 through
20, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
Case No. C 12-05760 MMC
ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION ADJUSTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT HISOFT
TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,
LTD.’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR
STAY CLAIMS [DOCKET NOS. 11, 13]
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties’
21 undersigned counsel, pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2, and other applicable law, as follows:
RECITALS
22
23
A.
Defendant hiSoft Technology International, Ltd. (“hiSoft”) filed a
24 Motion to Dismiss or Stay Claims on November 16, 2012 [Docket Nos. 11] prior to the
25 Court issuing its Order reassigning this case to the Hon. Maxine M. Chesney. On
26 November 19, 2012, hiSoft re-noticed its Motion to Dismiss or Stay Claims for hearing on
27 January 11, 2013 [Docket No. 13];
28
-1-
STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS
1
B.
Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties agree to adjust the briefing
2 schedule such that the Plaintiffs’ opposition brief will be filed on December 7, 2012, and
3 hiSoft’s reply brief will be filed on December 21, 2012.
4
C.
This stipulation to adjust the briefing schedule on hiSoft’s Motion will
5 not impact the currently scheduled hearing, and will result in the completion of all briefing
6 21 days prior to the January 11, 2013 hearing.
7
STIPULATION
8
9
1.
The parties respectfully request that the Court modify the briefing
10 schedule on hiSoft’s pending Motion to Dismiss or Stay Claims scheduled for hearing on
11 January 11, 2013, as follows: Plaintiffs’ opposition brief shall be filed by December 7,
12 2012, and hiSoft’s reply brief shall be filed by December 21, 2012.
13
SO STIPULATED.
14
15 DATED: November 28, 2012
16
LINDQUISTLAW
17
18
By
19
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ALANA KASELITZ and MELISSA KASELITZ
20
21
22 DATED: November 28, 2012
23
/s/ TED C. LINDQUIST, III
TED C. LINDQUIST, III
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
24
25
26
27
28
By
/s/ STEVEN N. WILLIAMS
STEVEN N. WILLIAMS
Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant
HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
-2-
STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS
1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
2
Dated: November 29 2012
__,
3
4
HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
CERTIFICATION
I, Ted C. Lindquist, III, am the ECF User whose identification and password
15 are being used to file this Stipulation Adjusting Briefing Schedule On Defendant hiSoft
16 Technology International, Ltd.’s Motion to Dismiss or Stay Claims [Docket Nos. 11, 13].
17 In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Steven N. Williams,
18 counsel for Specially Appearing Defendant hiSoft Technology International, Ltd., has
19 concurred in this filing.
20
21 DATED: November 28, 2012
22
LINDQUISTLAW
23
24
By
/s/ TED C. LINDQUIST, III
TED C. LINDQUIST, III
25
26
27
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ALANA KASELITZ and MELISSA KASELITZ
28
-3-
STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?