Kaselitz et al v. Hisoft Technology International, Ltd et al

Filing 18

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS. Plaintiffs' opposition brief shall be filed by December 7, 2012, and hiSoft's reply brief shall be filed by December 21, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 29, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 TED C. LINDQUIST, III (Cal. Bar No. 178523) LINDQUISTLAW 2 100 Pine Street, Suite 2150 San Francisco, California 94111 3 Telephone: 415-399-1159 Facsimile: 866-255-4580 4 Email: tlindquist@lindquistlaw.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ALANA KASELITZ and MELISSA KASELITZ 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 ALANA KASELITZ, an individual; and MELISSA KASELITZ, an individual, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 HISOFT TECHNOLOGY 15 INTERNATIONAL, LTD., a Cayman Islands exempt company; TIAK KOON 16 LOH, an individual; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 Case No. C 12-05760 MMC ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS [DOCKET NOS. 11, 13] 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties’ 21 undersigned counsel, pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2, and other applicable law, as follows: RECITALS 22 23 A. Defendant hiSoft Technology International, Ltd. (“hiSoft”) filed a 24 Motion to Dismiss or Stay Claims on November 16, 2012 [Docket Nos. 11] prior to the 25 Court issuing its Order reassigning this case to the Hon. Maxine M. Chesney. On 26 November 19, 2012, hiSoft re-noticed its Motion to Dismiss or Stay Claims for hearing on 27 January 11, 2013 [Docket No. 13]; 28 -1- STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS 1 B. Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties agree to adjust the briefing 2 schedule such that the Plaintiffs’ opposition brief will be filed on December 7, 2012, and 3 hiSoft’s reply brief will be filed on December 21, 2012. 4 C. This stipulation to adjust the briefing schedule on hiSoft’s Motion will 5 not impact the currently scheduled hearing, and will result in the completion of all briefing 6 21 days prior to the January 11, 2013 hearing. 7 STIPULATION 8 9 1. The parties respectfully request that the Court modify the briefing 10 schedule on hiSoft’s pending Motion to Dismiss or Stay Claims scheduled for hearing on 11 January 11, 2013, as follows: Plaintiffs’ opposition brief shall be filed by December 7, 12 2012, and hiSoft’s reply brief shall be filed by December 21, 2012. 13 SO STIPULATED. 14 15 DATED: November 28, 2012 16 LINDQUISTLAW 17 18 By 19 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ALANA KASELITZ and MELISSA KASELITZ 20 21 22 DATED: November 28, 2012 23 /s/ TED C. LINDQUIST, III TED C. LINDQUIST, III COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 24 25 26 27 28 By /s/ STEVEN N. WILLIAMS STEVEN N. WILLIAMS Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LTD. -2- STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 2 Dated: November 29 2012 __, 3 4 HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 CERTIFICATION I, Ted C. Lindquist, III, am the ECF User whose identification and password 15 are being used to file this Stipulation Adjusting Briefing Schedule On Defendant hiSoft 16 Technology International, Ltd.’s Motion to Dismiss or Stay Claims [Docket Nos. 11, 13]. 17 In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Steven N. Williams, 18 counsel for Specially Appearing Defendant hiSoft Technology International, Ltd., has 19 concurred in this filing. 20 21 DATED: November 28, 2012 22 LINDQUISTLAW 23 24 By /s/ TED C. LINDQUIST, III TED C. LINDQUIST, III 25 26 27 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ALANA KASELITZ and MELISSA KASELITZ 28 -3- STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?