Kaselitz et al v. Hisoft Technology International, Ltd et al
Filing
22
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 14, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
ALANA KASELITZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
No. C-12-5760 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,
LTD., et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On December 8, 2012, plaintiffs filed opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss, as
well as two declarations in support of the opposition. Plaintiffs have violated the Civil Local
Rules of this District and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing “to provide for
chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers
Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced documents. Plaintiffs are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply
with the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely
1
2
provided to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: December 14, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?