Kaselitz et al v. Hisoft Technology International, Ltd et al

Filing 60

ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTIONS TO VACATE IN PART AND TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD. The deadline for the parties to file their respective reply briefs shall be February 3, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 15, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2016)

1 TED C. LINDQUIST, III (SBN 178523)
LINDQUISTLAW
2 100 Pine Street, Suite 2150
San Francisco, California 94111
3 Telephone:
415-399-1159
Facsimile:
866-255-4580
4 Email: [e-mail]
5 MICHAEL RUBIN (SBN 80618)
EILEEN B. GOLDSMITH (SBN 218029)
6 ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 300
7 San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone:
415-421-7151
8 Facsimile:
415-362-8064
Email: [e-mail]
9 Email: [e-mail]
10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ALANA KASELITZ and MELISSA KASELITZ
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17 ALANA KASELITZ, an individual; and
MELISSA KASELITZ, an individual,
18
19
Plaintiffs,
20
21

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN
SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTIONS TO
VACATE IN PART AND TO CONFIRM
ARBITRATION AWARD

v.

22

Arbitration Hearing: July 20, 2015
Final Award issued: October 23, 2015

23 HISOFT TECHNOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL , LTD., et al.,
24
25

Case No. 12-cv-5760-MMC

Defendants.

Application to Correct Submitted to Arbitrator:
November 2, 2015
Final Disposition on Application to Correct
Issued: November 30, 2015

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS;
Case No. 12-cv-5760-MMC

1

WHEREAS pursuant to a briefing schedule agreed to by the parties, Plaintiffs filed a

2 Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award in Part on January 8, 2016, and Defendant hiSoft Technology
3 International, Ltd., simultaneously filed a Motion to Confirm the Arbitration Award, and the
4 parties have noticed their respective cross-motions for hearing on February 26, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.;
5

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to file their respective oppositions to the cross-motions

6 on January 22, 2016, in accordance with Local Rule 7-3;
7

WHEREAS under Local Rule 7-3, the parties’ reply briefs in support of their respective

8 motions would be due on January 29, 2016;
9

WHEREAS due to the unavailability of Plaintiffs’ attorneys Michael Rubin and Eileen

10 Goldsmith on January 29, 2016, and because those attorneys have primary responsibility for
11 drafting Plaintiffs’ reply brief, the parties have agreed that their respective reply briefs shall be due
12 on February 3, 2016;
13

WHEREAS the agreed-upon due date for reply briefs is 23 days before the parties have

14 noticed their cross-motions for hearing,
15

The parties hereby stipulate as follows:

16

1. The deadline for the parties to file their respective reply briefs shall be February 3, 2016.

17
Dated: January 14, 2016

ALTSHULER BERZON LLP

18
19

By:

/s/ Eileen B. Goldsmith

20

Eileen B. Goldsmith

21

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Melissa and Alana Kaselitz

22
Dated: January 14, 2016

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP

23
By:

/s/ Joyce Chang _______

24
Joyce Chang
25
26

Attorneys for Defendant hiSoft Technology
International, Ltd.

27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS;
Case No. 12-cv-5760-MMC

1
2

ECF CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that she has obtained

3 concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document.
4

Dated: January 14, 2016

5
6

/s/ Eileen Goldsmith_________
Eileen Goldsmith

7

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Melissa and Alana Kaselitz

8
9

[PROPOSED] ORDER

10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12 Dated: January 15 2016
___________,
13

______________________________
HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS;
Case No. 12-cv-5760-MMC