Kaselitz et al v. Hisoft Technology International, Ltd et al
Filing
66
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Hisoft Technology International, Ltd against Alana Kaselitz, Melissa Kaselitz. 1. Plaintiffs motion to vacate the arbitration award is hereby DENIED.2. Defendants motion to confirm the arbitration award is hereby GRANTED. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2016)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
ALANA KASELITZ, an individual; and
MELISSA KASELITZ, an individual,
No. CV-12-5760 MMC
7
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
11
12
HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,
LTD., a Cayman Islands exempt company; and
TIAK KOON LOH, an individual,
Defendants.
/
13
14
15
16
17
() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues
have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The
issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
19
1. Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the arbitration award is hereby DENIED.
20
2. Defendant’s motion to confirm the arbitration award is hereby GRANTED.
21
22
Dated: February 19, 2016
Susan Y. Soong, Clerk
23
24
By: Tracy Lucero
25
26
27
28
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?