Kaselitz et al v. Hisoft Technology International, Ltd et al

Filing 66

CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Hisoft Technology International, Ltd against Alana Kaselitz, Melissa Kaselitz. 1. Plaintiffs motion to vacate the arbitration award is hereby DENIED.2. Defendants motion to confirm the arbitration award is hereby GRANTED. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2016)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6

ALANA KASELITZ, an individual; and
MELISSA KASELITZ, an individual,

No. CV-12-5760 MMC

7
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
11
12

HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,
LTD., a Cayman Islands exempt company; and
TIAK KOON LOH, an individual,
Defendants.
/

13
14
15
16
17

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues
have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The
issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

19

1. Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the arbitration award is hereby DENIED.

20

2. Defendant’s motion to confirm the arbitration award is hereby GRANTED.

21
22
Dated: February 19, 2016

Susan Y. Soong, Clerk

23
24

By: Tracy Lucero
25
26
27
28

Deputy Clerk