Architectural Resources Group, Inc. et al v. HKS, Inc.

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Entire action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/12/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

JONATHAN S. O'DONNELL (SBN 100051)
[e-mail]
DWIGHT C. DONOVAN (SBN 114785)
[e-mail]
JACK PRAETZELLIS (SBN 267765)
[e-mail]
MBV LAW LLP
855 Front Street
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-989-5143

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants Architectural Resources
Group, Inc.; Ideas Consulting, Inc.

9

R E E T
9 4 1 1 1
S T
C A

L A W

1 0 1
V A L L E J O
S A N F R A N C I S C O

M B V

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
L L P

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16

ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES
GROUP, INC., a California corporation;
and IDEAS CONSULTING, INC., a California corporation,

19

v.
HKS, INC., a Texas corporation,
Defendant.

20
21

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2)]

Plaintiffs,

17
18

Case No. C 12 5787 SI

AND RELATED COUNTER ACTIONS.

22
23

The parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipu-

24

late to dismissal of the entire action, and all claims, counterclaims, and third-party

25

claims encompassed thereby, with prejudice, consisting of the following:

26

1.

All claims of plaintiffs Architectural Resources Group, Inc. and Ideas Con-

27

sulting, Inc. (including claims assigned by Loisos + Ubbelohde and Tipping Mar + Asso-

28

ciates) as asserted in the First Amended Complaint dated February 8, 2013;
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER
CASE NO. C 12 5787 SI

1

2.

All counterclaims and third-party claims asserted by HKS, Inc., a Texas

2

corporation, in its First Amended Counter and Third Party Complaint dated February

3

28, 2013.

4

3.

Each party shall bear its own fees and costs in connection with the action.

5

MBV LAW LLP

6
7

Dated: December 11, 2013.

8
9
10
L L P

SMITH, CURRIE & HANCOCK LLP

12
13

Dated: December 11, 2013.

14
8 5 5
F R O N T
S A N F R A N C I S C O

M B V

L A W

S

T R E E T
C A 9 4 1 1 1

11

By s/DWIGHT C. DONOVAN
DWIGHT C. DONOVAN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. and IDEAS CONSULTING, INC.

15

By s/CHARLES E. ROGERS
CHARLES E. ROGERS
Attorneys for Defendant, Counterclaimant
and Third-Party Plaintiff HKS, INC.

16
SEVERSON & WERSON

17
18
19

Dated: December 11, 2013.

20
21
22
23

By s/PETER C. LYON
PETER C. LYON
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendants
GEORGE LOISOS dba LOISOS +
UBBELOHDE ASSOCIATES, INC.; SUSAN
UBBELOHDE dba LOISOS + UBBELOHDE
ASSOCIATES, INC.; and TIPPING MAR +
ASSOCIATES
ORDER

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: ________________.
December 12, 2013

26
27
The Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Judge

28
-221930.71/4819-0318-3895, v. 2

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER
CASE NO. C 12 5787 SI